Trident


http://www.sportinglife.com/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=boxing/09/10/17/BOXING_Froch_Nottingham.html

Froch must have been in a different fight from the one everyone else and the judges watched.. and scored.
 
Makes himself look stupid IMO

LOL....he lost that fight badly. Had Taylor's corner played it smarter in the 12th, Froch would have been soundly beaten on points.
 
I just don't rate Froch at all and last night nails it for me

TBH mate Ive lost interest in boxing bets full stop now.

After the Paulie M robbery the other month its clear that its just a bent sport. Never bet last night because of that fight and Im please now!lol

 Even as a Froch fan I thought Dirrell did enough to nick the decision on the strength of rounds 9/10/11 where he was too fast for Froch. How about the Taylor/Abraham fight? They showed it on the big screen before the Froch fight, what a cracking punch!

 On a side note I was pretty disgusted with some of the so called boxing "fans" shouting abuse at Dirrell, makes you proud to be British doesnt it?

at least froch fought with some balls, which is a hell of a lot more than you can say for the yank.

How you can call yourself a "fighter" then run away from a fight is a bloody mystery to me.

Dirrell fought scared, not just a case of wanting to stay on the outside and box, more a case of "I don;t want to get hurt"

Admittedly, Dirrel outboxed Froch, but scoring for cowardess isn't going to happen by a uk boxing judge.  Dirrel never had him hurt or in any trouble, his best punch was a straight left which Froch ate.

With the point deduction I had even. Dirrell was a bit too quick to 'slip and fall', and generally hide in the earlier rounds.

Robbery? Some people are just retarded. A close fight, could have gone either way. But a robbery? LOL!

Not an entertaining fight. Dirrel never done enough to take the title IMO.
I give Dirrel some credit for his boxing abilities and he caught Froch with a few good shots.
I don't think the fight got started until round 9.

If it was not for the early fight and lovely punch buy Abraham I would of wasted my money.

Integra


Robbery? Some people are just retarded. A close fight, could have gone either way. But a robbery? LOL!

Now now, no need to be bitter.. LMAO!

Trident

Integra


Robbery? Some people are just retarded. A close fight, could have gone either way. But a robbery? LOL!

Now now, no need to be bitter.. LMAO!

Yep. exactly what I was saying. No need to be bitter Trident, its nobodies fault other than Dirrells that he lost.
 
Robbery indeed, lol! Of course you didnt bet, the benefit of hindsight is such a fantastic thing.....pmsl

Integra

Trident

Integra


Robbery? Some people are just retarded. A close fight, could have gone either way. But a robbery? LOL!

Now now, no need to be bitter.. LMAO!

Yep. exactly what I was saying. No need to be bitter Trident, its nobodies fault other than Dirrells that he lost.
 
Robbery indeed, lol! Of course you didnt bet, the benefit of hindsight is such a fantastic thing.....pmsl

Mid rounds indeed....
 
'Retarded' LMAO... I shall enjoy your wit untill you get yourself banned again, which will happen.
 
  
 

anyone got any links to the fight i was working when it wa son and it doesnt seem to be coming up on boxing-core at the mo!!

odog


anyone got any links to the fight i was working when it wa son and it doesnt seem to be coming up on boxing-core at the mo!!

You don't want to see it! Trust me!

It didn't start to near 3am, I stayed in to watch in and it is one of the most regrettable things i've done in the whole of 2009.

Neb


LOL....he lost that fight badly.

He didnt lose it badly. He was behind on two scorecards but wore him down and KOd him. Just like Chavez Jnr did to Meldrick Taylor but nobody goes on about Chavez losing that badly.
 
Title fights are over 12 rounds not 11 and four fifths.
 

Trident

Integra

Trident

Integra


Robbery? Some people are just retarded. A close fight, could have gone either way. But a robbery? LOL!

Now now, no need to be bitter.. LMAO!

Yep. exactly what I was saying. No need to be bitter Trident, its nobodies fault other than Dirrells that he lost.
 
Robbery indeed, lol! Of course you didnt bet, the benefit of hindsight is such a fantastic thing.....pmsl

Mid rounds indeed....
 
'Retarded' LMAO... I shall enjoy your wit untill you get yourself banned again, which will happen.  
   

No wit. You picked the wrong guy, and your other 'value bets' didnt quite come off buddy. No shame in that. might aswell keep trying and trying until the outsider eventually comes up trumps.
 
The only robbery here was the bookies pocketing your 'value' bets. To suggest Dirrell did enough in that fight to claim a robbery is not quite retarded but definitely borderline.

The concensus in repsect to the JCChavez  v Meldrick Taylor fight is that JCC was a very fortunate man indeed.

I think Froch has also been riding his luck a little too much.

For what its worth i agree with Steeles stoppage of the JCC Taylor fight. If you cant defend yourself then the ref should step in, regardless of how long is left.

I also hate this aggression scoring. Did Dirrell land more of the knuckle part of the glove on the target area than Froch? If the answer is yes then he gets the round surely?

Chavez may have been fortunate but the scenario is the same - he didnt lose. Nor did Froch. A KO is a KO be it in the first second or the last.

Re aggression, neither were very accurate or clean with their work but Froch was the one coming forward so would edge any close round as 'the aggressor'.

A close fight which could have gone either way - all 3 judges agreed on just 4 of the rounds? - but in no way whatsoever was this a robbery.

kinglean


The concensus in repsect to the JCChavez  v Meldrick Taylor fight is that JCC was a very fortunate man indeed.

For what its worth i agree with Steeles stoppage of the JCC Taylor fight. If you cant defend yourself then the ref should step in, regardless of how long is left.

Steeles was taking back handers from don king the ****. He should never have stopped that chavez fight, taylor took hard punches for every round of that fight. With only a few seconds left, steeles knew this was his last chance to steal the fight for don king and he did it. Poor taylor is all i can say, the man can barley talk properly now....

speydream
 
Poor taylor is all i can say, the man can barley talk properly now....

Evidence that Steele was correct to stop the fight.

Integra

speydream
 
Poor taylor is all i can say, the man can barley talk properly now....

Evidence that Steele was correct to stop the fight.

No, thats from years of brawling, not simply because of the chavez fight.

Those last few seconds would not have made a difference and you know it.

Integra

Trident

Integra

Trident

Integra


Robbery? Some people are just retarded. A close fight, could have gone either way. But a robbery? LOL!

Now now, no need to be bitter.. LMAO!

Yep. exactly what I was saying. No need to be bitter Trident, its nobodies fault other than Dirrells that he lost.
 
Robbery indeed, lol! Of course you didnt bet, the benefit of hindsight is such a fantastic thing.....pmsl

Mid rounds indeed....
 
'Retarded' LMAO... I shall enjoy your wit untill you get yourself banned again, which will happen.  
   

No wit. You picked the wrong guy, and your other 'value bets' didnt quite come off buddy. No shame in that. might aswell keep trying and trying until the outsider eventually comes up trumps.
 
The only robbery here was the bookies pocketing your 'value' bets. To suggest Dirrell did enough in that fight to claim a robbery is not quite retarded but definitely borderline.

As I say , It wont be long before your banned again. Why? simply because you cannot stop your mouth running way with yourself from behind your keyboard.
 
What will that make it? 4 bans?