5.

There is no evidence of my 'mouth running way with myself' on his thread.

Simple fact is that you incorrectly called the winner, incorrectly called the 'value bets', claimed a 'robbery' - despite it being nothing more than a closely fought SD which happens every weekend - yet can not see the irony in your own remarks in the aftermath. Nothing more, nothing less.

Integra


5.

There is no evidence of my 'mouth running way with myself' on his thread.

Simple fact is that you incorrectly called the winner, incorrectly called the 'value bets', claimed a 'robbery' - despite it being nothing more than a closely fought SD which happens every weekend - yet can not see the irony in your own remarks in the aftermath. Nothing more, nothing less.

The man has a point

 

Integra


5.
 
Speaks volumes realy.

There is no evidence of my 'mouth running way with myself' on his thread.
 
"Some people are just retarded".... Typical comments to cause unrest in a thread. Even after 4 bans for similar stuff you dont seem to change.

Simple fact is that you incorrectly called the winner, incorrectly called the 'value bets', claimed a 'robbery' - despite it being nothing more than a closely fought SD which happens every weekend - yet can not see the irony in your own remarks in the aftermath. Nothing more, nothing less.

 
Your right. What you did do was manage to predict the 1/3 odds on Fav to win, which he did, but only just.
 
I did indeed name 'value bets' which as you should know are bets which are priced higher than they should be and offer value. Your prediction of a Froch stoppage was actually what those bets were!
 
TBH  virtualy every prediction you make on here is simply that the favourite will win the fight. Its that simple. The method you pick is mostly the one thats the most probable and that the majority agree on in internet land. Should they lose then its one of those things, but should they win, which odds on Favs mostly do! then this thread gives a classis example of your cockyness and attitude, IE the 'Retarded' comments.
 
As for mocking myself for actually picking fighters who are not favourites and mocking my lack of success, well all I can say is that ive probably started 15 to 20 threads on here over the last 7 to 8 years (mostly in general) stateing I think a strong outsider or even extreme outsider will win a fight. I would say that probably 10 of those threads have been correctly predicted. I will do a search but fear some will have been lost in forum cleanups.The long standing members here will remember them Im sure. Tim Bradley at 6/1, Sexton 7/2. Stateing that Prescot was being tipped in the betting circles for a 10/1 win only hours before the fight. Tipping Harrison to get beat by Williams at 10/1.
 
Im happy to stick my neck out on the tough to calls ones such as Witter v Alexander, which you sat on the fence for. Even money fight when I called It correctly.
 
 
 
 

Here we go again clutching at straws with hastily edited words to paper over the cracks.

Trident


 

Integra


5.
 
Speaks volumes realy.

There is no evidence of my 'mouth running way with myself' on his thread.
 
"Some people are just retarded".... Typical comments to cause unrest in a thread. Even after 4 bans for similar stuff you dont seem to change.

Simple fact is that you incorrectly called the winner, incorrectly called the 'value bets', claimed a 'robbery' - despite it being nothing more than a closely fought SD which happens every weekend - yet can not see the irony in your own remarks in the aftermath. Nothing more, nothing less.

 
Your right. What you did do was manage to predict the 1/3 odds on Fav to win, which he did, but only just.
 
I did indeed name 'value bets' which as you should know are bets which are priced higher than they should be and offer value. Your prediction of a Froch stoppage was actually what those bets were!
 
TBH  virtualy every prediction you make on here is simply that the favourite will win the fight. Its that simple. The method you pick is mostly the one thats the most probable and that the majority agree on in internet land. Should they lose then its one of those things, but should they win, which odds on Favs mostly do! then this thread gives a classis example of your cockyness and attitude, IE the 'Retarded' comments.
 
As for mocking myself for actually picking fighters who are not favourites and mocking my lack of success, well all I can say is that ive probably started 15 to 20 threads on here over the last 7 to 8 years (mostly in general) stateing I think a strong outsider or even extreme outsider will win a fight. I would say that probably 10 of those threads have been correctly predicted. I will do a search but fear some will have been lost in forum cleanups.The long standing members here will remember them Im sure. Tim Bradley at 6/1, Sexton 7/2. Stateing that Prescot was being tipped in the betting circles for a 10/1 win only hours before the fight. Tipping Harrison to get beat by Williams at 10/1.
 
Im happy to stick my neck out on the tough to calls ones such as Witter v Alexander, which you sat on the fence for. Even money fight when I called It correctly.
 
 
 
 

I'm manager of a Ladbrokes and I'll say that approximetly half of odds on favourites lose in racing and about a third in football.

He did pick the odds on favourite, saying it was a likely thing to happen- and he was right.  Who cares what the betting market says- it's made up from what experts think and the money on the different outcomes.

He wasn't saying "I've got a tip for you" he was saying "I think x will happen" which it did.

As for value bets, it's pointless saying 7/1 for conduit is good value when you yourself believe that sea the stars is going to win.

Don't get me wrong you have made several correct predictions despite the betting market being against you, and it's quite impressive when you take into account long odds on a two horse race.

steve124149

Trident

Integra


5.

Speaks volumes realy.

There is no evidence of my 'mouth running way with myself' on his thread.

"Some people are just retarded".... Typical comments to cause unrest in a thread. Even after 4 bans for similar stuff you dont seem to change.

Simple fact is that you incorrectly called the winner, incorrectly called the 'value bets', claimed a 'robbery' - despite it being nothing more than a closely fought SD which happens every weekend - yet can not see the irony in your own remarks in the aftermath. Nothing more, nothing less.

Your right. What you did do was manage to predict the 1/3 odds on Fav to win, which he did, but only just.
 
I did indeed name 'value bets' which as you should know are bets which are priced higher than they should be and offer value. Your prediction of a Froch stoppage was actually what those bets were!
 
TBH  virtualy every prediction you make on here is simply that the favourite will win the fight. Its that simple. The method you pick is mostly the one thats the most probable and that the majority agree on in internet land. Should they lose then its one of those things, but should they win, which odds on Favs mostly do! then this thread gives a classis example of your cockyness and attitude, IE the 'Retarded' comments.
 
As for mocking myself for actually picking fighters who are not favourites and mocking my lack of success, well all I can say is that ive probably started 15 to 20 threads on here over the last 7 to 8 years (mostly in general) stateing I think a strong outsider or even extreme outsider will win a fight. I would say that probably 10 of those threads have been correctly predicted. I will do a search but fear some will have been lost in forum cleanups.The long standing members here will remember them Im sure. Tim Bradley at 6/1, Sexton 7/2. Stateing that Prescot was being tipped in the betting circles for a 10/1 win only hours before the fight. Tipping Harrison to get beat by Williams at 10/1.
 
Im happy to stick my neck out on the tough to calls ones such as Witter v Alexander, which you sat on the fence for. Even money fight when I called It correctly.
 
 

 

I'm manager of a Ladbrokes and I'll say that approximetly half of odds on favourites lose in racing and about a third in football.

He did pick the odds on favourite, saying it was a likely thing to happen- and he was right.  Who cares what the betting market says- it's made up from what experts think and the money on the different outcomes.

He wasn't saying "I've got a tip for you" he was saying "I think x will happen" which it did.

As for value bets, it's pointless saying 7/1 for conduit is good value when you yourself believe that sea the stars is going to win.

Don't get me wrong you have made several correct predictions despite the betting market being against you, and it's quite impressive when you take into account long odds on a two horse race.

 
In boxing i would say 7/10 odds on Favs win. Short odds on favs which Integra often picks win in probably 8/10 cases. I would be amazed if he could name an outsider who hes picked thats been over 6/4, let alone 6/1.
 
My point being that constant fav backing in boxing is a very easy thing to do and requires no skill what so ever, your simply just running with the odds and what the majority say. A 1/3 win on an SD is a skin of the teeth thing.
 
Junior witter was an 1/8 Fav when when I started a thread saying he would get beat by the 6/1 bradley. When he lost there was no sign of me taking the pis* out of Integra nor anyone else who disagreed with me on any matter.
 
Thats realy the crux of this thread now. Its not realy about who picks which fighter or who wins but more about respecting other peoples views. Integra lacks this quaility and thus has been banned 4 times from the forum, which does speak volumes.
 
Dirrell winning on points was a very near miss with the SD. Yes Froch won in a close fight, but the mid round stoppage was indeed way off the mark, thus the a limp home 1/3 is hardly the grounds to start calling people retards.
 
Cheers, Rich
  
  
  

 

Integra


Here we go again clutching at straws with hastily edited words to paper over the cracks.

x2

I watched this fight last night from the 7th onwards thought froch was lucky tbh but would be intrested to see the whole fight. Frochs hands were soo low towards the end of the fight are they normally like this because it wont be long before he gets ktfo !!

are they normally like this

 
Yes....tbf, he can take a punch, he has also been put on his arse but I really can't see him holding onto that belt for much longer

Fair enough i was thinking if that dirrell bloke had properly connected with a big one could have gone down. 

Trident

Integra

Trident

Integra


Robbery? Some people are just retarded. A close fight, could have gone either way. But a robbery? LOL!

Now now, no need to be bitter.. LMAO!

Yep. exactly what I was saying. No need to be bitter Trident, its nobodies fault other than Dirrells that he lost.
 
Robbery indeed, lol! Of course you didnt bet, the benefit of hindsight is such a fantastic thing.....pmsl

Mid rounds indeed....
 
'Retarded' LMAO... I shall enjoy your wit untill you get yourself banned again, which will happen.
 
  
 

 
I enjoyed your wit.

Ah, the bitterness is overwhelming....

Hows it going Integra?? LMAO.

LOL

LOL

nice double Neb