HGH?

As a 36 year old, a year back into training, would you guys suggest i concentrate my attentions on HGH or gear cycles like sus/deca/pron/nolv.
 
i have been studying AAS recently and wont be taking anything for another 6 months anyway but, having spoke to an experienced BB at my gym he reckons I'd be better off with GH (@36 yrs old).
 
I've been reading its slow but lean gains, great for tendons ect and obviously not as hardcore as above mentioned AAS.
 
Is it really got enough oomph for a mid 30's boy like me who's life goal it is to attain some heavy big boy mass?!
 
Cheers boys.

I can't advise on it mate.. but all I can say is don't think HGH is not as 'hardcore' - completely the opposite imho, it can take you beyond genetics that steroids just improve.

Ronin


I can't advise on it mate.. but all I can say is don't think HGH is not as 'hardcore' - completely the opposite imho, it can take you beyond genetics that steroids just improve.

Ok, the studies will continue. Just read a few articles this morning that suggested they weren't as volatile as some test combos.
Possibly got the jist a little wrong or incomplete with 'morning brain'!
 

Need to think about the cost. HGH will be alot more expensive.

yannyboy


Need to think about the cost. HGH will be alot more expensive.

Hi mate, what am I looking to lay out for a 10 week cycle of the following: Sus 250/Deca/Pronabol 5/Nolvadex.
 
And for a good cycle of HGH?

test deca etc will give you great size and gains growth imo is not a mass builder (maybe at pro level and 16iu per day +) its more of a fine tuning aid to a good cutting cycle with a good diet i only use growth when getting ready for a show 8-12 weeks 4iu per day 5 on 2 off split.

For pure size and cost effectivness test and deca anyday.

You cant talk prices mate its not allowed.

But the cost is all dose dependant

Cheers

Bottom line: Are certain AAS/ Stacks better suited for the slightly older (Mid 30's+) or not age relevant?

I wouldn`t say so.. I would say extended recovery time from cycles is a bigger factor as you get older..

A low dose deca/test cycle will benefit everybody regardless of age..

GH isn't a mass-builder. But it goes well with AAS and used for PCT seems to be able to help me maintain my hard-earned mass. As for being older, probably the harsher compounds like tren are not such a good idea, as an older body isn't as biologically resilient. Being in one's 30s is not old. You've got plenty of time to add more size if you eat right and plan your cycles and PCT well. Because natural hormone levels decrease with age, old guys (over 50, for sure) definitely should be using test just for health reasons (IMO), as well as to maintain muscle mass and help with sexual functions.

You guys keep using expressions like 'test' and 'AAS'= testosterone and androgenic anabolic steroids, whats the difference?