Well a few things that stood out about what he said was,when doing intervals, after a few weeks its non beneficial. But i think its common sense to say that, after a few weeks of doing any training(not just intervals) your going to hit a plateau, so adjusments will need to be made.
The point underneath about what is the person supposed to do for the 46 weeks in the rest of the year.Well again refering to other training, would you stick to the same weights routine 4 a whole year? no. just as you wouldnt with intervals, so not a very strong argument there.
The point about Lance Armstrong only imroving his efficiency by 1% a year.This is quite imressive actual seeing that he is at the top of his game!But is not a good point to be made to the average gym user, because its more than likely the average gym user is going to imrove by more than 1%(dependant on training, diet etc).
I quote "the total calorie burn during a longer steady state bout will be in excess of whatever occurs from interval training".This statement is a bit pointless, because he doesnt give an example of how long the sscv session is or the interval session. So its a bit of common sense really if ran an 1hr of sscv and 20mins of intervals im obviously going burn more fat kcals on the sscv!
Few more points i could add but dont want to bore you!
<message edited by adam_5kids on 06 March 2010 16:25>