Aaron Hallett
-
Total Posts
:
26705
-
Reward points
:
5479
- Joined: 04/04/2006
- Location: Pompey
|
Tampa Bay Pro - Results (including 202lb class)
-
09 August 2009 22:10
MEN'S BODYBUILDING 1. Dennis James 2. Fouad Abiad 3. Ben Pakulski 4. Bill Wilmore 5. Ben White MEN'S 202 1. David Henry 2. John Hodgson <------ brit!!! 3. Lee Powell <----- brit!!!! 4. Steve Namat 5. Richard "Tricky" Jackson WOMEN'S BODYBUILDING 1. Betty Pariso 2. Gale Frankie 3. Tina Chandler 4. Nicole Ball 5. Klaudia Larson Dennis James      Line up     Brillaint day for John Hodgson and Lee Powell, who have now qualified for the Olympia! Brilliant result for british bodybuilding.     
|
|
LMC
-
Total Posts
:
14456
-
Reward points
:
6996
- Joined: 24/02/2004
- Location: daarn sarf
|
Re:Tampa Bay Pro - Results (including 202lb class)
-
09 August 2009 22:12
Good to see David Henry win the men's 202 after seeing the thread a few days ago.
" Don't go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you nothing. It was here first." Mark Twain
|
|
James
-
Total Posts
:
43553
-
Reward points
:
9481
- Joined: 10/11/2000
- Location: Northants, UK
|
Re:Tampa Bay Pro - Results (including 202lb class)
-
09 August 2009 23:51
Great stuff - thanks for the pics
Good to see the UK doing so well in the u202s
James Collier
MT Co-Owner & Event Promoter Like us on Facebook: 
|
|
JK2
-
Total Posts
:
14703
-
Reward points
:
4963
- Joined: 14/07/2003
- Location: London United Kingdom
|
Re:Tampa Bay Pro - Results (including 202lb class)
-
10 August 2009 08:40
Is it 202 for a reason? Why not 200?
|
|
Aaron Hallett
-
Total Posts
:
26705
-
Reward points
:
5479
- Joined: 04/04/2006
- Location: Pompey
|
Re:Tampa Bay Pro - Results (including 202lb class)
-
10 August 2009 08:44
no idea...it is an odd number to pick
|
|
mackenzie_uk
-
Total Posts
:
2933
-
Reward points
:
2798
- Joined: 18/09/2008
- Location: United Kingdom
|
Re:Tampa Bay Pro - Results (including 202lb class)
-
10 August 2009 09:50
JohnKerr2
Is it 202 for a reason? Why not 200?
I used to think that it was because it was bang on 90kg, but apparetly 202lb is 91.6kg. So now I have no idea and really want to know...
"Why Climb a Mountain, when you can become one..."
|
|
Tony Barnes
-
Total Posts
:
16836
-
Reward points
:
6356
- Joined: 07/10/2004
- Location: Leeds
|
Re:Tampa Bay Pro - Results (including 202lb class)
-
10 August 2009 10:23
Good to see John H taking 2nd, both he and Lee look the nuts there, props.
|
|
Drago
-
Total Posts
:
5251
-
Reward points
:
3137
- Joined: 02/05/2007
|
Re:Tampa Bay Pro - Results (including 202lb class)
-
10 August 2009 10:50
he's got a rather scary grin that fella
|
|
Mr.M
-
Total Posts
:
10687
-
Reward points
:
5838
- Joined: 06/03/2005
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
|
Re:Tampa Bay Pro - Results (including 202lb class)
-
10 August 2009 14:53
david henry is immense..
powell looks massive for 202 too!! great showing from both of them..
good t see james win as well! still not a fan of his midsection but looks huuge and dieted well! :-)
|
|
swordfish
-
Total Posts
:
3762
-
Reward points
:
4907
- Joined: 10/12/2006
- Location: Bournmouth
|
Re:Tampa Bay Pro - Results (including 202lb class)
-
10 August 2009 16:47
im quite confused. this is under 202? whats the next catogry up?
If that is a heavy class i guess im bigger than i thought as im 210lbs and have only got another 10-15lbs to loose before i come in at that condition
|
|
Mr.M
-
Total Posts
:
10687
-
Reward points
:
5838
- Joined: 06/03/2005
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
|
Re:Tampa Bay Pro - Results (including 202lb class)
-
10 August 2009 17:08
the next category is the heavies.. i.e. jay, ronnie etc etc..
this is pro remember mate so there is , IIRC, only 2 categories.. 202lbs, and then anythin above that where all the big names are..
u reckon ur in that shape fella???
PICS!!!!!!!!!
haha... :-)
|
|
Aaron Hallett
-
Total Posts
:
26705
-
Reward points
:
5479
- Joined: 04/04/2006
- Location: Pompey
|
Re:Tampa Bay Pro - Results (including 202lb class)
-
10 August 2009 18:01
yeah ditto lol, pics!!!
i competed at 215lbs and i needed to lose another good 20lbs but no where near the size of henry/flex lewis lol
|
|
swordfish
-
Total Posts
:
3762
-
Reward points
:
4907
- Joined: 10/12/2006
- Location: Bournmouth
|
Re:Tampa Bay Pro - Results (including 202lb class)
-
10 August 2009 18:24
Incredible Bulk
yeah ditto lol, pics!!!
i competed at 215lbs and i needed to lose another good 20lbs but no where near the size of henry/flex lewis lol
This is what makes it confusing. your not 8ft tall so why is it they look much bigger than you even if you lost a further 15lbs of fat so you were the same weight its confusing I think i am asbig as them because when i have been to shows they dont look asbig stood next to them as they do in pics from the stage.
|
|
drab4
-
Total Posts
:
37035
-
Reward points
:
8412
- Joined: 26/02/2002
- Location: United Kingdom
|
Re:Tampa Bay Pro - Results (including 202lb class)
-
10 August 2009 18:31
Ben Pakulski is looking good there
|
|
drab4
-
Total Posts
:
37035
-
Reward points
:
8412
- Joined: 26/02/2002
- Location: United Kingdom
|
Re:Tampa Bay Pro - Results (including 202lb class)
-
10 August 2009 18:37
swordfish
Incredible Bulk
yeah ditto lol, pics!!!
i competed at 215lbs and i needed to lose another good 20lbs but no where near the size of henry/flex lewis lol
This is what makes it confusing. your not 8ft tall so why is it they look much bigger than you even if you lost a further 15lbs of fat so you were the same weight its confusing
I think i am asbig as them because when i have been to shows they dont look asbig stood next to them as they do in pics from the stage.
Height difference comes into it Henry is 5'5 according to his bio
|
|