Bookmark this thread:  |
Login | |
|
RE: the apprentice - Mar. 28 2008 6:59:56
| |
|
H20
Posts: 7192
Joined: Jun. 23 2004 From: Manchester England Status: offline
 |
quote:
ORIGINAL: sillynarbie Also, I dislike this notion that people seem to have that people academically bright are useless. This is nothing short of a load of bollocks. It is true that people with degrees and qualifications are sometimes useless, and numpties at even basic tasks. But the same can be said about people who aren't well educated. There are people who can be bright and have common sense, you know. I think most people recognise this mate but the difference is the arrogant attitude and a misplaced sense of self-belief and self-importance from a great many of them, you also don`t get many uneducated people who have good business sense sounding off how good they are on such a grand scale unless they actually are`in comparison`, I think there`s a big difference.
< Message edited by H20 -- Mar. 28 2008 8:37:19 >
_____________________________
Look after your body,it is the greatest thing you will EVER own----Bazil Baines Dodging the rain and bullets since 1966.
| |
|
RE: the apprentice - Mar. 28 2008 8:08:02
| |
|
Dr Zoidberg
Posts: 5963
Joined: Oct. 18 2003 From: United Kingdom Status: offline
 |
quote:
ORIGINAL: sillynarbie Also, I dislike this notion that people seem to have that people academically bright are useless. This is nothing short of a load of bollocks. It is true that people with degrees and qualifications are sometimes useless, and numpties at even basic tasks. But the same can be said about people who aren't well educated. There are people who can be bright and have common sense, you know. I can only talk from my own experience I don't know , perhaps the 'academically bright' ones WERE being clever by avoiding the workload ? I don't know ... But what I saw was too consistant to deny for me personally - maybe in place of 'academically bright' I should be saying University educated ? - some of the less educated guys I had were actually very bright and resourceful guys Perhaps they thought too much ? ,While the "less bright" employees would simply get on and do the task in hand without question , maybe the brighter ones felt it required thinking time ? Who knows - All I know is that whenever we ended up a guy on a break from Uni , we ended uo with a white elephant of an employee Maybe it was down to the lack of familiarity with manual work ? I don't know - maybe the REALLY clever ones avoided working at my place ?
| |
|
RE: the apprentice - Mar. 28 2008 8:11:15
| |
|
sillynarbie
Posts: 3193
Joined: Mar. 6 2004 From: England Status: offline
 |
You must be joking!! That women that said she was the best salesperson in Europe has Irish leaving cert - equivalent to GCSE's I believe. They're all hyping themselves up, they're all arrogant, and all of them think they're better than they are. It's got nothing to do with education. Simon - last year's winner, I would say he was one of the least arrogant on the show yet he was a Cambridge graduate. There are a great many people on the apprentice and in the world who can sell stuff to people, but left with the complexity of running a company or "outside of the box" thinking, they are utterly average. As much as sir alan seems to hate bright people with good educations, he went completely against that decision last year when somebody who showed more "business nouse" was chosen as a runner up to the person who was an unfinished product but who was bright and had lots of potential. Everyone also needs to remember that the apprentice is just done for TV ratings these days. Most of the people there are have no business savvy at all. Bear in mind that most who have the skills to succeed in the business world already have done, and wouldn't consider going on a programme like the apprentice because a) they're already earning more money b) they're already in a better job. Most of the people on the apprentice are just mediocre salespeople who think they're god's gift. I personally have no respect for sales monkeys, and being able to sell does not make you a good businessman, which is what really gets my goat with the apprentice.
| |
|
RE: the apprentice - Mar. 28 2008 8:19:19
| |
|
sillynarbie
Posts: 3193
Joined: Mar. 6 2004 From: England Status: offline
 |
quote:
ORIGINAL: Dr Zoidberg quote:
ORIGINAL: sillynarbie Also, I dislike this notion that people seem to have that people academically bright are useless. This is nothing short of a load of bollocks. It is true that people with degrees and qualifications are sometimes useless, and numpties at even basic tasks. But the same can be said about people who aren't well educated. There are people who can be bright and have common sense, you know. I can only talk from my own experience I don't know , perhaps the 'academically bright' ones WERE being clever by avoiding the workload ? I don't know ... But what I saw was too consistant to deny for me personally - maybe in place of 'academically bright' I should be saying University educated ? - some of the less educated guys I had were actually very bright and resourceful guys Perhaps they thought too much ? ,While the "less bright" employees would simply get on and do the task in hand without question , maybe the brighter ones felt it required thinking time ? Who knows - All I know is that whenever we ended up a guy on a break from Uni , we ended uo with a white elephant of an employee Maybe it was down to the lack of familiarity with manual work ? I don't know - maybe the REALLY clever ones avoided working at my place ? I dunno mate. No offence to you but most of the really high-flying bright graduates will be doing summer work at blue-chip employers in the commercial/management side of the business, not doing manual work in a factory. But let me say this; getting into University and getting a degree in our country is not difficult. Any old idiot can do it. Many people who are for want of a better phrase, thick as ****, manage to get degrees these days. That is just a reflection on the state of the education system of our country. So a degree says nothing about the intelligence or capability of a candidate. Obviously the better the Univeristy you go to, and the harder the course, the more likely you are to find bright and capable people. But they make up only 10-20% of the people that graduate from our Universities every year. The vast majority are just run-of-the-mill kids who couldn't find a job at 18 or don't know what to do so delay the real world 3 years and have fun. So it is no wonder that 3 years spent in a bar and occasionally doing some piss-easy exams means that these people are more useless when they come out of University than they went in and they probably weren't intelligence or bright to begin with.
| |
|
RE: the apprentice - Mar. 28 2008 8:38:43
| |
|
H20
Posts: 7192
Joined: Jun. 23 2004 From: Manchester England Status: offline
 |
quote:
sillynarbie You must be joking!! Which part exactly mate ? PS I`ve editted my original post with`in comparison` which I meant to put in initially.
_____________________________
Look after your body,it is the greatest thing you will EVER own----Bazil Baines Dodging the rain and bullets since 1966.
| |
|
RE: the apprentice - Mar. 28 2008 8:45:49
| |
|
matt_1972
Posts: 496
Joined: Feb. 23 2007 From: Manchester Status: online
 |
Sky plussed it and watched last night. Very cringe-worthy. The quality of the contestants always makes me laugh, by the way, what is a global price leader?????
| |
|
RE: the apprentice - Mar. 28 2008 8:51:13
| |
|
matt_1972
Posts: 496
Joined: Feb. 23 2007 From: Manchester Status: online
 |
quote:
ORIGINAL: sillynarbie quote:
ORIGINAL: Dr Zoidberg quote:
ORIGINAL: sillynarbie Also, I dislike this notion that people seem to have that people academically bright are useless. This is nothing short of a load of bollocks. It is true that people with degrees and qualifications are sometimes useless, and numpties at even basic tasks. But the same can be said about people who aren't well educated. There are people who can be bright and have common sense, you know. I can only talk from my own experience I don't know , perhaps the 'academically bright' ones WERE being clever by avoiding the workload ? I don't know ... But what I saw was too consistant to deny for me personally - maybe in place of 'academically bright' I should be saying University educated ? - some of the less educated guys I had were actually very bright and resourceful guys Perhaps they thought too much ? ,While the "less bright" employees would simply get on and do the task in hand without question , maybe the brighter ones felt it required thinking time ? Who knows - All I know is that whenever we ended up a guy on a break from Uni , we ended uo with a white elephant of an employee Maybe it was down to the lack of familiarity with manual work ? I don't know - maybe the REALLY clever ones avoided working at my place ? I dunno mate. No offence to you but most of the really high-flying bright graduates will be doing summer work at blue-chip employers in the commercial/management side of the business, not doing manual work in a factory. But let me say this; getting into University and getting a degree in our country is not difficult. Any old idiot can do it. Many people who are for want of a better phrase, thick as ****, manage to get degrees these days. That is just a reflection on the state of the education system of our country. So a degree says nothing about the intelligence or capability of a candidate. Obviously the better the Univeristy you go to, and the harder the course, the more likely you are to find bright and capable people. But they make up only 10-20% of the people that graduate from our Universities every year. The vast majority are just run-of-the-mill kids who couldn't find a job at 18 or don't know what to do so delay the real world 3 years and have fun. So it is no wonder that 3 years spent in a bar and occasionally doing some piss-easy exams means that these people are more useless when they come out of University than they went in and they probably weren't intelligence or bright to begin with. I was reading your post and found myself agreeing with most of it until this. All universities are moderated to ensure the standard of work is the same. Therefore if cambridge and manchester university run the same course, it will be as difficult to pass at one as at the other. The drop out rates and standard of the students may be drastically different, the course content will not. *steps down and puts soap box under desk*
| |
|
RE: the apprentice - Mar. 28 2008 9:11:19
| |
|
Dr Zoidberg
Posts: 5963
Joined: Oct. 18 2003 From: United Kingdom Status: offline
 |
quote:
ORIGINAL: sillynarbie I dunno mate. No offence to you but most of the really high-flying bright graduates will be doing summer work at blue-chip employers in the commercial/management side of the business, not doing manual work in a factory. ^^^ Yes I think you may onto something there !
| |
|
RE: the apprentice - Mar. 28 2008 9:23:26
| |
|
Dr Zoidberg
Posts: 5963
Joined: Oct. 18 2003 From: United Kingdom Status: offline
 |
Just watched it on BBC iPlayer (frankly the best thing to come out of the BBC in history ! - I almost don't begrudge paying my licence fee now ) I cannot believe how poorly that went ! , I am sure that there must have been some behind the scenes direction there to make things look worse than they are - ( FFS , you are given a Van load of fish - whats the first thing you should do ? Go to a cafe and think up a name ) ....Or the Girls going into a Fishmongers to ask about Pitches , but not bothering to take note of the Prices ? I thought the Boys team leader did as good a job as could be expected considering what he had to work with , he had no concept of his team members strengths , and there cannot really be held accountable for their shortcomings The "rift" in the group was simply caused by the contempt of the other two egomaniacs (both of which were up with firing with him ) and I suspect that Alan Sugar could see this from a mile off , I think he made the right decision , I am glad to see that Nicholas go though , as he was to wet to go any further IMO (Barrister my ass ! ) , but the other guy (Rafe ? ) has a similar Persona with the Balls to try and build on it , so he will be less likely to get booted so quickly , but IMO has just as much potential for making my skin crawl
| |
|
RE: the apprentice - Mar. 28 2008 9:25:42
| |
|
kitty
Posts: 23357
Joined: Aug. 26 2003 From: Chorley, Lancashire Status: offline
 |
DrZ, if you can get the BBC2 aftershow as well, that's worth watching
_____________________________
Jan05 Oct07 Sponsored by Muscle Finesse
| |
|
RE: the apprentice - Mar. 28 2008 9:36:15
| |
|
Dr Zoidberg
Posts: 5963
Joined: Oct. 18 2003 From: United Kingdom Status: offline
 |
Just watching now , Cheers
| |
|
RE: the apprentice - Mar. 28 2008 9:38:11
| |
|
ThaiFighter
Posts: 3032
Joined: Dec. 26 2005 From: Manchester Status: offline
 |
quote:
ORIGINAL: sillynarbie and being able to sell does not make you a good businessman, which is what really gets my goat with the apprentice. I beg to differ. Being able to sell is 70% of being of a good businessman. Yes, there's back-end stuff like fulfilment, product development, customer services etc...but these are all "high-quality" problems than come secondary to creating a demand for your good. If no one buys it...it doesn't matter if you're brilliant at customer service / shipping / locating stores etc. and all that other stuff. The most important thing in a business is that it's generating money profitably.
_____________________________
Bodybuilding Warehouse - The Best UK Supplements, Cheaper BSN Atro-Phex - Just £27.99 with FREE P&P!
| |
|
RE: the apprentice - Mar. 28 2008 9:42:26
| |
|
kitty
Posts: 23357
Joined: Aug. 26 2003 From: Chorley, Lancashire Status: offline
 |
Selling does not just mean 'trading' a product for money or similar. Selling can also mean selling your ideas to a board/committee/employees so a GOOD salesman with some nounce should be able to do well in business. That's how my hubbie started and he's done well (in fact sorry, he used to deliver for Currys before they let him on the sales floor)
_____________________________
Jan05 Oct07 Sponsored by Muscle Finesse
| |
|
RE: the apprentice - Mar. 28 2008 9:45:37
| |
|
ThaiFighter
Posts: 3032
Joined: Dec. 26 2005 From: Manchester Status: offline
 |
quote:
ORIGINAL: Dr Zoidberg Just watched it on BBC iPlayer (frankly the best thing to come out of the BBC in history ! - I almost don't begrudge paying my licence fee now ) I cannot believe how poorly that went ! , I am sure that there must have been some behind the scenes direction there to make things look worse than they are - ( FFS , you are given a Van load of fish - whats the first thing you should do ? Go to a cafe and think up a name ) ....Or the Girls going into a Fishmongers to ask about Pitches , but not bothering to take note of the Prices ? I thought the Boys team leader did as good a job as could be expected considering what he had to work with , he had no concept of his team members strengths , and there cannot really be held accountable for their shortcomings The "rift" in the group was simply caused by the contempt of the other two egomaniacs (both of which were up with firing with him ) and I suspect that Alan Sugar could see this from a mile off , I think he made the right decision , I am glad to see that Nicholas go though , as he was to wet to go any further IMO (Barrister my ass ! ) , but the other guy (Rafe ? ) has a similar Persona with the Balls to try and build on it , so he will be less likely to get booted so quickly , but IMO has just as much potential for making my skin crawl I think part of the reason why they were so naf, is probably a corporate mentality. I know when I left Accenture, I took ages to learn how smaller businesses really work. I spent ages talking about share splits with my then business partner, I also spent ages on the website for a company that I ultimatly couldn't get off the ground, and I also didn't have the balls / was too risk averse to spend enough money for it to take off. Most of the reasons behind this were that my background was in working for a massive consultancy - I was used to making sure everything was 110% correct before doing it, generating client buy-in to ideas, and checking things could be backed up if it went wrong. That is completely the wrong mentality for a small business, and a start up, where what's less important is being right 100% of the time, and what's more important is just getting out there and doing ANYTHING to get it started. Now I find that even if I make mistakes....it's only important that my decisions are right 60% of the time or so. For example, in my sex business, we do alot of adwords spending. I found that spending on the term "sex toys" was absolutely useless, and we lost money on it, on the other hand, spending money on the terms "i rub my duckie", and many others, is vastly profitable. You just have to take risks and deal with problems as they come up - like over-orderings, under-ordering, etc etc. The reason the apprentice guys get small business wrong is that it's just tottally different to big business. If you're from a big business, common sense is just a different thing. You need to be able to convince other's in your political strata of your judgements 100% of the time, in small business...everyone understands you'll make mistakes and that it'll constantly happen, and you're small enough to notice and fix them when they do occur. That's my view.
< Message edited by ThaiFighter -- Mar. 28 2008 9:46:06 >
_____________________________
Bodybuilding Warehouse - The Best UK Supplements, Cheaper BSN Atro-Phex - Just £27.99 with FREE P&P!
| |
|
RE: the apprentice - Mar. 28 2008 10:01:48
| |
|
sillynarbie
Posts: 3193
Joined: Mar. 6 2004 From: England Status: offline
 |
quote:
ORIGINAL: matt_1972 quote:
ORIGINAL: sillynarbie quote:
ORIGINAL: Dr Zoidberg quote:
ORIGINAL: sillynarbie Also, I dislike this notion that people seem to have that people academically bright are useless. This is nothing short of a load of bollocks. It is true that people with degrees and qualifications are sometimes useless, and numpties at even basic tasks. But the same can be said about people who aren't well educated. There are people who can be bright and have common sense, you know. I can only talk from my own experience I don't know , perhaps the 'academically bright' ones WERE being clever by avoiding the workload ? I don't know ... But what I saw was too consistant to deny for me personally - maybe in place of 'academically bright' I should be saying University educated ? - some of the less educated guys I had were actually very bright and resourceful guys Perhaps they thought too much ? ,While the "less bright" employees would simply get on and do the task in hand without question , maybe the brighter ones felt it required thinking time ? Who knows - All I know is that whenever we ended up a guy on a break from Uni , we ended uo with a white elephant of an employee Maybe it was down to the lack of familiarity with manual work ? I don't know - maybe the REALLY clever ones avoided working at my place ? I dunno mate. No offence to you but most of the really high-flying bright graduates will be doing summer work at blue-chip employers in the commercial/management side of the business, not doing manual work in a factory. But let me say this; getting into University and getting a degree in our country is not difficult. Any old idiot can do it. Many people who are for want of a better phrase, thick as ****, manage to get degrees these days. That is just a reflection on the state of the education system of our country. So a degree says nothing about the intelligence or capability of a candidate. Obviously the better the Univeristy you go to, and the harder the course, the more likely you are to find bright and capable people. But they make up only 10-20% of the people that graduate from our Universities every year. The vast majority are just run-of-the-mill kids who couldn't find a job at 18 or don't know what to do so delay the real world 3 years and have fun. So it is no wonder that 3 years spent in a bar and occasionally doing some piss-easy exams means that these people are more useless when they come out of University than they went in and they probably weren't intelligence or bright to begin with. I was reading your post and found myself agreeing with most of it until this. All universities are moderated to ensure the standard of work is the same. Therefore if cambridge and manchester university run the same course, it will be as difficult to pass at one as at the other. The drop out rates and standard of the students may be drastically different, the course content will not. *steps down and puts soap box under desk* You're very sadly misinformed mate. The content varies so drastically it is not even funny. For example; I do Maths and Physics at Nottingham. Nottingham is regarded as a top Uni by most people in the know in this country. I've done a whole year long course in Calculus, as will other people doing a degree in Maths at other Unis, at cambridge they don't even bother and go straight onto higher level material. The standard of the work they do is also much harder than that of any other Maths degree in the country. That's why the Mathematics Tripos at Cambridge it's the most respected degree in the world. You simply cannot make the standard the same across all Universities. Think of a student at Teeside Uni with EEE at A-level, he will not be able to cope with the same content or same difficulty of Maths as someone with AAAAA at A-level, and so there is a huge difference in the standard of course depending on the quality of the student and subsequently the quality of the University. That is why graduate employers recruit mostly from the top Universities and don't really consider people outside of this elite group of Universities. Although it is still possible to gain employment if you're exceptional in other ways, usually. They would not publish leagues tables if all Universities were equal.
| |
|
RE: the apprentice - Mar. 28 2008 10:04:52
| |
|
sillynarbie
Posts: 3193
Joined: Mar. 6 2004 From: England Status: offline
 |
quote:
ORIGINAL: H20 quote:
sillynarbie You must be joking!! Which part exactly mate ? PS I`ve editted my original post with`in comparison` which I meant to put in initially. I meant joking about the others not blowing their own trumpets. They're all so far up their own arses I'm surpised they can breath. It's got nothing to with educational background. To be fair, people with degrees sometimes do think they're owed something or that they're better than people without when it's not founded on any tangible results, but I think with regards to the Apprentice specifically the educated people are only as arrogant as the non-educated.
| |
|
RE: the apprentice - Mar. 28 2008 10:10:26
| |
|
JohnKerr2
Posts: 6429
Joined: Jul. 14 2003 From: London United Kingdom Status: offline
 |
quote:
ORIGINAL: ThaiFighter I was used to making sure everything was 110% correct before ... Hah! You've inadvertently just nailed the 'Apprentice' mentality! People who use the term '110%'.
_____________________________
Your attitude reeks of that of somebody who went to a lower ranking University hoping that their education is seen as equal to those that went to a better one.
| |
|
RE: the apprentice - Mar. 28 2008 10:41:03
| |
|
MonkFinger
Posts: 3170
Joined: May 11 2004 From: 'ampshire Status: offline
 |
quote:
ORIGINAL: matt_1972 All universities are moderated to ensure the standard of work is the same. Are they? Are they really? Because if they are exactly the same, then a top ten redbrick uni course will hold as much weight as one run by an ex-polytech?
_____________________________
Scissor me, Xerxes!
| |
|
RE: the apprentice - Mar. 28 2008 10:47:44
| |
|
JohnKerr2
Posts: 6429
Joined: Jul. 14 2003 From: London United Kingdom Status: offline
 |
quote:
ORIGINAL: MonkFinger quote:
ORIGINAL: matt_1972 All universities are moderated to ensure the standard of work is the same. Are they? Are they really? Because if they are exactly the same, then a top ten redbrick uni course will hold as much weight as one run by an ex-polytech? It's true to say that the perception of educational quality provided by different university varies widely, even when knowledge about the course content and teaching quality is unknown.
_____________________________
Your attitude reeks of that of somebody who went to a lower ranking University hoping that their education is seen as equal to those that went to a better one.
| |
|
RE: the apprentice - Mar. 28 2008 10:54:17
| |
|
sillynarbie
Posts: 3193
Joined: Mar. 6 2004 From: England Status: offline
 |
It's untrue to say the quality of it's content and teaching is unknown. There are assessments made at regular intervals and these are used to construct league tables which go a fair way to guiding public perception. But the main factor in quality perception is determined by juding the calibre of graduates that emerge from the institution. It just so turns out that the Univerisities with the highest entrance requirements, the most difficult exams, the most rigorous teaching, tend to produce the highest quality graduates.
| |
|
|