Bookmark this thread:     |
Login  | |
|
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 18 2008 19:38:13
| |
|
DeepSquatter
Posts: 1397
Joined: Nov. 13 2004
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Fat Pete
You can't get much more wrong than that either
By your own admission you are not 18 stone nor are you a serious trainer nor can you bench 160 so what the hell do you know about it
Other than the 000s of people that only you have seen
It's called reflected glory.
They think, just by carrying the spit bucket, some of the greatness may rub off on them.
| |
|
|
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 18 2008 19:47:34
| |
|
swift
Posts: 4796
Joined: Mar. 21 2007
From: uknown
Status: offline
|
_____________________________
ABC
| |
|
|
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 18 2008 19:47:43
| |
|
stephen77
Posts: 2205
Joined: Jul. 28 2005
Status: offline
|
210kg for a few reps.
seen a couple of 200kgraw benchs from people around 100kg mark
| |
|
|
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 18 2008 19:50:24
| |
|
Red Man
Posts: 4633
Joined: Oct. 11 2006
From: North West
Status: offline
|
Regardless of body weight, a 160kg bench press is a very strong lift imo. This thread has just turned into a pointless argument now and we will never have 100% agreement.
_____________________________
5 Times Baby, Still 5, For now....
"You're not drunk if you can lie on the floor without holding on." Dean Martin
| |
|
|
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 18 2008 19:54:12
| |
|
R3261
Posts: 2578
Joined: Jul. 27 2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
This thread has just turned into a pointless argument now and we will never have 100% agreement
stirred for the sake of argument only it seems
< Message edited by R3261 -- Apr. 18 2008 20:02:35 >
_____________________________
Journal
| |
|
|
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 19 2008 4:22:08
| |
|
Integra
Posts: 8814
Joined: Sep. 23 2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
It's called reflected glory.
They think, just by carrying the spit bucket, some of the greatness may rub off on them.
Its called being correct.
The fact that some members on this thread have agreed with me - possibly as many as those that have disagreed - validates my opinion.
Others seem to have taken past comments to heart and hold some kind of internet grudge. I will not lose sleep over this, nor will they get the kind of response they are looking for in their trolling.
< Message edited by Integra -- Apr. 19 2008 7:24:26 >
| |
|
|
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 19 2008 6:38:53
| |
|
daKensta
Posts: 3666
Joined: Apr. 6 2004
From: Edinburgh
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: just t
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=CXiFZXjWi8U
no lift.
it wasn't paused, and his heels weren't touching the floor.
anyone could do that 
_____________________________
5' 11" 95kg
SQ:200 BP:150 DL:230 OHP:110
| |
|
|
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 19 2008 9:54:28
| |
|
Fat Pete
Posts: 8490
Joined: Aug. 5 2004
From: A pie shop in the North West
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Integra
quote:
It's called reflected glory.
They think, just by carrying the spit bucket, some of the greatness may rub off on them.
Its called being correct.
It's called postulation, where facts are invented to back up theories without substance.
You fail to qualify on all three counts but insist it would be easy if you did.
I qualify on all three counts and assure you that it isn't easy, very do-able, but certainly not easy. So an unbaised observer might just consider that my facts take pride of place over your theories.
Not in your world they don't.
And you accuse others of trolling. Now that's rich 
_____________________________
The older I get, the more I recall, how little I knew, when I knew it all
| |
|
|
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 19 2008 10:56:16
| |
|
Integra
Posts: 8814
Joined: Sep. 23 2006
Status: offline
|
I have seen far more 18 stone trainers benching 160kg than I have seen 18 stone trainers benching sub-160kg. Therefore statistically a 160kg bench press should be easy for a serious trainer weighing 18 stone. I am sure there are many who do not believe this, but caring about what strangers on an internet forum think of me does not feature very high on my list of priorities.
You are merely disagreeing based on your own experience. Which is fine as it is a free country.
Trying to force your opinions on others by demonstrating the size of your e-peen may work on others but does not work on me.
Continue to disagree if you want, I do not care. It is not the first time and it will not be the last.
| |
|
|
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 19 2008 10:59:48
| |
|
Fat Pete
Posts: 8490
Joined: Aug. 5 2004
From: A pie shop in the North West
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Integra
Continue to disagree if you want, I do not care. It is not the first time and it will not be the last.
That's very kind. Yes please, I will continue to disagree with you on this point
_____________________________
The older I get, the more I recall, how little I knew, when I knew it all
| |
|
|
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 19 2008 11:02:00
| |
|
Fat Pete
Posts: 8490
Joined: Aug. 5 2004
From: A pie shop in the North West
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Integra
Trying to force your opinions on others by demonstrating the size of your e-peen may work on others but does not work on me.
I have no idea what an e-peen is. I'm not sure that I even have one.
But as I have apparntly demonstrated it's size to you, would you be kind enough to tell me how large it is, then I can use that information to narrow down my field of search.
_____________________________
The older I get, the more I recall, how little I knew, when I knew it all
| |
|
|
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 19 2008 11:05:08
| |
|
john_cappa
Posts: 2614
Joined: Apr. 5 2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Fat Pete
I have no idea what an e-peen is. I'm not sure that I even have one.
i think ask red man pete (if i remember correctly) as integra thinks he has one aswell!
_____________________________
quote:
I like to be fashionable, I usually wear my jeans pretty loose so people can see my deseigner boxers and my shirt small&tight so you can see my Armani belt buckle
My journal
| |
|
|
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 19 2008 11:17:13
| |
|
Fat Pete
Posts: 8490
Joined: Aug. 5 2004
From: A pie shop in the North West
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: john_cappa
quote:
ORIGINAL: Fat Pete
I have no idea what an e-peen is. I'm not sure that I even have one.
i think ask red man pete (if i remember correctly) as integra thinks he has one aswell!
He does indeed, as does MightyBowman who actually unsheathed his (I did a search on e-peen) it would appear to be an invention of integras
Gentlemen, can you assist an old fat fool ?
_____________________________
The older I get, the more I recall, how little I knew, when I knew it all
| |
|
|
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 19 2008 11:21:36
| |
|
sivvy1
Posts: 2114
Joined: Jun. 18 2006
From: Andover
Status: offline
|
so integra, what your saying is you have seeen more 18 stone assisted lifters bench 160 than you have seen 18 stone lifters not bench 160?
| |
|
|
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 19 2008 11:34:58
| |
|
jack5r
Posts: 2711
Joined: Jul. 26 2007
Status: offline
|
can we just get back to curling please.
geees..
_____________________________
JOURNAL
Age - 18
Bench - 90kg (at 62kg)
Deadlift - 110kgx5 (at 62kg)
Squat - 105kg (at 63kg)
| |
|
|
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 19 2008 12:14:03
| |
|
DeepSquatter
Posts: 1397
Joined: Nov. 13 2004
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Integra
]A serious trainer for me is someone who has spent a great deal of time and effort in the gym and has the body to match.
'body to match' does not necessarily mean huge and shredded
quote:
My definition is as stated above. 'Body to match' does not mean huge and shredded.
Do yourself a favour, take sometime more to think about the point you want to get across before hitting the qwerty.
Above is a perfect example.
You cant define something by saying what it isn't.
Define a dog, a dog isn't cat doesn't move things on.
| |
|
|
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 19 2008 12:32:27
| |
|
DeepSquatter
Posts: 1397
Joined: Nov. 13 2004
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
|
Deepsquatter: How many of these '000's are drug assisted?
Integra: Not many.
Deepsquatter: If it's not many - how many? lets deal is specifics
Integra: I meant not many are not drug assisted, I misread your question
Again, if you spent a bit more tiime thinking what you typed then you'd make less mistakes. If you have a valid point then it just confuses the issue when you make these type of mistakes.
| |
|
|
Printable Version
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread