MuscleTalk Bodybuilding Forum
Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  My Subscription  My Forums  Member List  Search  FAQ  Ticket List  Help MT  Log Out
Sponsor Message
BSN, CNP & Gaspari Supplements
Great Service Everytime!
FREE DELIVERY!
MuscleTalk Publications
NEW!
Muscle Menus 2 ...


Muscle Menus 2
Bodybuilding supplements at MuscleTalk Shop
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)
Logged in as: Guest (JOIN FREE)
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> General >> RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Powered by: SuperiorSupplements.co.uk - Fast Free Delivery & GUARANTEED Lowest Prices on Reflex Nutrition, Optimum Nutrition, MuscleTech and Maximuscle - Train Hard - Recover Fast - Pay Less - BUY NOW!
Bookmark this thread:
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 17 2008 16:47:38   
Integra


Posts: 8814
Joined: Sep. 23 2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dan Nukem

Thought of another, I could do a set of 25 close grip chins without too much struggle, so you would assume my biceps are strong.



Not really, CGC's are not a bicep isolation.

(in reply to Dan Nukem)
Post #: 61
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 17 2008 16:56:42   
Dan Nukem


Posts: 9400
Joined: Sep. 21 2002
From: Ireland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Integra

A lot of possibles there but does not really change anything.

A sub one and a half times bodyweight bench press should be pretty easy for a serious trainer at 117kg.


So assuming the vast majority of trainers on this site would be close to the 100kg mark, why are there so few people who can bench 150kg? (regardless of ease)

(in reply to Integra)
Post #: 62
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 17 2008 16:58:23   
Integra


Posts: 8814
Joined: Sep. 23 2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dan Nukem


quote:

ORIGINAL: Integra

A lot of possibles there but does not really change anything.

A sub one and a half times bodyweight bench press should be pretty easy for a serious trainer at 117kg.


So assuming the vast majority of trainers on this site would be close to the 100kg mark, why are there so few people who can bench 150kg? (regardless of ease)


They arent.

By 'serious trainer' I do not mean recreational bulkers.

(in reply to Dan Nukem)
Post #: 63
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 17 2008 17:15:33   
Fat Pete


Posts: 8503
Joined: Aug. 5 2004
From: A pie shop in the North West
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Integra

At 18 stone 160kg should be easy for a serious trainer.


No it isn't. 160 kg is just over 350 lbs, that is heavy and it is never easy.

Many talk the talk, few walk the walk


_____________________________

The older I get, the more I recall, how little I knew, when I knew it all

(in reply to Integra)
Post #: 64
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 17 2008 17:16:51   
Integra


Posts: 8814
Joined: Sep. 23 2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Fat Pete


quote:

ORIGINAL: Integra

At 18 stone 160kg should be easy for a serious trainer.


No it isn't. 160 kg is just over 350 lbs, that is heavy and it is never easy.

Many talk the talk, few walk the walk



Yes it is.

If a serious trainer - by my definition - weighing 18 stone could not bench press 160kg I would be very surprised.

I have never met a serious trainer weighing 18 stone who could not bench press at least 160kg. And I have met hundreds.

< Message edited by Integra -- Apr. 17 2008 17:19:09 >

(in reply to Fat Pete)
Post #: 65
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 17 2008 17:18:43   
Fat Pete


Posts: 8503
Joined: Aug. 5 2004
From: A pie shop in the North West
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Integra
Yes it is.


Can you do it ?


_____________________________

The older I get, the more I recall, how little I knew, when I knew it all

(in reply to Integra)
Post #: 66
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 17 2008 17:19:39   
Integra


Posts: 8814
Joined: Sep. 23 2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fat Pete


quote:

ORIGINAL: Integra
Yes it is.


Can you do it ?



I am not 18 stone. If I was then most definitely yes I could.

(in reply to Fat Pete)
Post #: 67
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 17 2008 17:21:29   
Fat Pete


Posts: 8503
Joined: Aug. 5 2004
From: A pie shop in the North West
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Integra
I am not 18 stone. If I was then most definitely yes I could.


How very convenient


_____________________________

The older I get, the more I recall, how little I knew, when I knew it all

(in reply to Integra)
Post #: 68
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 17 2008 17:24:12   
Integra


Posts: 8814
Joined: Sep. 23 2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fat Pete


quote:

ORIGINAL: Integra
I am not 18 stone. If I was then most definitely yes I could.


How very convenient




Convenient or not it does not change the statement that a serious trainer at 18 stone should be able to bench press 160kg.

(in reply to Fat Pete)
Post #: 69
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 17 2008 17:27:00   
R3261


Posts: 2578
Joined: Jul. 27 2007
Status: offline
how often have you seen it done?

what is a serious trainer ?

_____________________________

Journal


(in reply to Integra)
Post #: 70
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 17 2008 17:33:26   
Integra


Posts: 8814
Joined: Sep. 23 2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: R3261

how often have you seen it done?

what is a serious trainer ?


If this is directed at me - hundreds of times.

A serious trainer for me is someone who has spent a great deal of time and effort in the gym and has the body to match, rather than recreational bulkers who do not.

My opinion that a serious trainer weighing 18 stone should be able to bench press 160kg is a valid one based on my experience.

(in reply to R3261)
Post #: 71
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 17 2008 18:46:50   
rightyho


Posts: 10361
Joined: May 6 2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dan Nukem

Was a Polish lad I was training with at the gym tonight.

I was well motivated by him and I set a new pb of 170k.
He did 180k and was only a shade off 190k to be fair.

Really satisfying stuff.

Could be wrong but don't recall seeing anyone bench that raw before.
Usually at my gym, nobody even benches 140k!


Quite a few doing between 500 and 600lb here.
Polish lad does just shy of 400 for seated press behind the neck, too.


_____________________________

MT all-round Member of the Year 2006 and 2007

Delivering the same rubbish in 2008

Join Righty's Common Sense Party now and use your right to vote to eliminate poverty, knife-crime, NHS waiting lists, poor standards of education and bum-bags.

(in reply to Dan Nukem)
Post #: 72
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 17 2008 18:48:22   
cricket_fire


Posts: 5058
Joined: Oct. 9 2004
From: Ontario, Canada
Status: online
quote:

No it isn't. 160 kg is just over 350 lbs, that is heavy and it is never easy.

Many talk the talk, few walk the walk

That's what I was thinking lol

Integra; I'm a little over 19 stone and can't press that without a shirt. I've also competed 4, soon to be 5 times. Am I not serious, or am I just pathetic?

_____________________________

Strength - Power - Hate

(in reply to Integra)
Post #: 73
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 17 2008 18:55:08   
Drago


Posts: 1840
Joined: May 2 2007
From: Dundee (orig- N.Ireland)
Status: offline
im sorry but Integra you are wrong!

160kg is a **** load of weight imo!

Also how many serious trainers are 18stone? Thats also a lot of weight To be fair!

Also i take offence at the term 'Recreational Bulker'

I train hard and have been on a continuous bulk for around a year although it is time to cut soon

160kg is 25stone you say that should be 'easy' for a man 18 stone

thats almost 1 and a half times his body weight! i dont think that would be easy!

_____________________________

My HEAVY DUTY JOURNAL
http://www.muscletalk.co.uk/m_2445473/tm.htm

(in reply to Integra)
Post #: 74
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 17 2008 19:15:25   
GOE1988


Posts: 609
Joined: Nov. 12 2004
From: WALES UK
Status: offline
quote:

I am not 18 stone. If I was then most definitely yes I could.


What an arsehole

_____________________________

To be successful its not the few hours you do in the gym. Its the hours out of the gym where the differences are made.

(in reply to Drago)
Post #: 75
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 17 2008 19:29:23   
Papa Lazarou


Posts: 9333
Joined: Feb. 16 2006
Status: online
Ooops - didnt mean to start a barny

I may try the 160-170k bench soon for 1RM but TBH I rarely do them as they provide little beyond ego boosts tbh. I dont know what is good or bad for a bench, all I know is I enjoying do it. Iron has taught me that good things come to he who is consistant and trains to be the best I can. As for what others do, I dunno, end of the day what someone else lifts doesnt mean squat to me - there is no gain in their strength or lack there of

_____________________________

"The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark... Lord, grant that I may always desire more than I can accomplish."
- Michelangelo

(in reply to GOE1988)
Post #: 76
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 17 2008 19:31:06   
Drago


Posts: 1840
Joined: May 2 2007
From: Dundee (orig- N.Ireland)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Papa Lazarou

Ooops - didnt mean to start a barny

I may try the 160-170k bench soon for 1RM but TBH I rarely do them as they provide little beyond ego boosts tbh. I dont know what is good or bad for a bench, all I know is I enjoying do it. Iron has taught me that good things come to he who is consistant and trains to be the best I can. As for what others do, I dunno, end of the day what someone else lifts doesnt mean squat to me - there is no gain in their strength or lack there of



muscle makes you weight!! (pardon the pun)

_____________________________

My HEAVY DUTY JOURNAL
http://www.muscletalk.co.uk/m_2445473/tm.htm

(in reply to Papa Lazarou)
Post #: 77
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 17 2008 19:39:39   
1MR


Posts: 10976
Joined: Nov. 5 2006
From: Kirkham (Fylde) UK
Status: offline
160kg. But I'll be able to do that by the end of the year so not that impressive really.

(I hope!)

< Message edited by 1MR -- Apr. 17 2008 19:40:07 >


_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: Furyan
I find usually, the only ones who wont admit genetics play a large part, are the ones gifted by them.

(in reply to Dan Nukem)
Post #: 78
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 17 2008 19:42:20   
GOE1988


Posts: 609
Joined: Nov. 12 2004
From: WALES UK
Status: offline
I do agree with Integra in one respect, 160kg raw bench isnt impressive unless at abodyweight of under 100kg.(or 100% drug free) I dont mean to offend anyone, and I am by no means backing Integra.

_____________________________

To be successful its not the few hours you do in the gym. Its the hours out of the gym where the differences are made.

(in reply to 1MR)
Post #: 79
RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen - Apr. 17 2008 19:50:19   
waylander


Posts: 266
Joined: Jul. 28 2005
Status: offline
I do not know were some people train but I have not seen 100s of people do 160Kg at any weight

(in reply to GOE1988)
Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [General] >> General >> RE: Biggest Raw bench you've seen Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:

Google
 
Webwww.MuscleTalk.co.uk


New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages

Muscle Building Nutrition
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition