MuscleTalk Bodybuilding Forum
Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  My Subscription  My Forums  Member List  Search  FAQ  Ticket List  Help MT  Log Out
Sponsor Message
The Works!
Where knowledge GIVES POWER
MuscleTalk Publications
Vegetarian..?

Vegetarian Muscle Menus
Bodybuilding supplements at MuscleTalk Shop
RE: glamour models
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)
Logged in as: Guest (JOIN FREE)
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> General >> RE: glamour models Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Powered by: SuperiorSupplements.co.uk - Fast Free Delivery & GUARANTEED Lowest Prices on Reflex Nutrition, Optimum Nutrition, MuscleTech and Maximuscle - Train Hard - Recover Fast - Pay Less - BUY NOW!
Bookmark this thread:
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: glamour models - Apr. 20 2008 12:37:00   
kitty


Posts: 24290
Joined: Aug. 26 2003
From: Chorley, Lancashire
Status: offline
Eddie, I'm getting confused in how to explain this, so I shall do it point by point

I find it shallow that people are saying that because someone has goods looks they should have a voice to match.

Who is to dictate what is a 'glamourous' voice? You like Russian, others may not.

Surely how ever someone speaks does not dictate their level of intellect, so that is why I think you're wrong in saying I'm slating members for now thinking in depth.

(I think that covers it)

_____________________________

Jan05
Oct07
Sponsored by Muscle Finesse

(in reply to theiopener)
Post #: 41
RE: glamour models - Apr. 20 2008 12:38:56   
theiopener


Posts: 20548
Joined: Jan. 6 2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kitty
Eddie, I'm getting confused in how to explain this, so I shall do it point by point

I find it shallow that people are saying that because someone has goods looks they should have a voice to match.

Who is to dictate what is a 'glamourous' voice? You like Russian, others may not.

Surely how ever someone speaks does not dictate their level of intellect, so that is why I think you're wrong in saying I'm slating members for now thinking in depth.

(I think that covers it)

Clear as crystal now, cheers

_____________________________

Journal
www.undergroundmuscle.co.uk



(in reply to kitty)
Post #: 42
RE: glamour models - Apr. 20 2008 12:42:27   
kitty


Posts: 24290
Joined: Aug. 26 2003
From: Chorley, Lancashire
Status: offline
Phew

_____________________________

Jan05
Oct07
Sponsored by Muscle Finesse

(in reply to theiopener)
Post #: 43
RE: glamour models - Apr. 20 2008 12:45:34   
gibbers


Posts: 2430
Joined: Oct. 8 2006
Status: offline
Amanda from Babecast is my fav at the mo.... Love her

(in reply to kitty)
Post #: 44
RE: glamour models - Apr. 20 2008 14:14:25   
dazzz


Posts: 3024
Joined: Mar. 15 2006
From: mids
Status: offline
kitty i didnt mean this as a "they look good but sound thick" thread.

i was just saying how, to look at them, i personally percieve them to sound different to what they do.

i was not saying that they sound stupid or that i wouldnt go near them

_____________________________

i didnt even get to your goals, but know what you are doing is neither good for man, beast or dead donkey (toxic toffee)

my journal http://www.muscletalk.co.uk/m_1124665/mpage_3/key_/tm.htm

(in reply to gibbers)
Post #: 45
RE: glamour models - Apr. 20 2008 15:10:41   
kitty


Posts: 24290
Joined: Aug. 26 2003
From: Chorley, Lancashire
Status: offline
Wasn't digging at you dazzz. I was just saying some of the comments in here were not nice and TIO took it in a different way that I was not originally referring to but then I ended up responding to him (which is why I got confused )

_____________________________

Jan05
Oct07
Sponsored by Muscle Finesse

(in reply to dazzz)
Post #: 46
RE: glamour models - Apr. 20 2008 15:30:13   
dazzz


Posts: 3024
Joined: Mar. 15 2006
From: mids
Status: offline
ok cool

_____________________________

i didnt even get to your goals, but know what you are doing is neither good for man, beast or dead donkey (toxic toffee)

my journal http://www.muscletalk.co.uk/m_1124665/mpage_3/key_/tm.htm

(in reply to kitty)
Post #: 47
RE: glamour models - Apr. 20 2008 16:15:53   
daveshow


Posts: 1387
Joined: May 14 2006
From: Dunbartonshire
Status: offline
Now while I wouldn't say no to any of these women. I think the point is they just coast through life on their looks. They would be very boring other wise just so superficial. No depth to them at all. To be honest I don't think half of them would even be that good in bed. I've seen the sex tapes and they are crap.

I think the ideal women is someone is beautiful without looking slutty, but with intelligence and someone who you can have deceant coversation with on a range of subjects not just heat magazine and shoes.

_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: drab4
You're actually trying to cause potentially fatal accidents, because you don't like horses?

That is rather odd


BW 12st 05lbs
Bench 90KG 1RM
Squats 100kg 5 reps
Deads 140kg 1RM

(in reply to dazzz)
Post #: 48
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [General] >> General >> RE: glamour models Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:

Google
 
Webwww.MuscleTalk.co.uk


New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages

Diet Supplements Revealed
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition