Bookmark this thread:     |
Login  | |
|
AM HIIT - May 2 2008 9:26:09
| |
|
Jimmy23
Posts: 121
Joined: May 11 2007
Status: offline
|
Morning all,
Okay so i'm looking to lose the final layer from my belly and was thinking of doing AM HIIT.
should i do this as soon as i wake up with only a glass of water down me or on some food?
also in regards to the HIIT training and how to perform this correctly has anyone got any links on this??
Thanks!
| |
|
|
RE: AM HIIT - May 2 2008 10:00:36
| |
|
Integra
Posts: 7807
Joined: Sep. 23 2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
Okay so i'm looking to lose the final layer from my belly and was thinking of doing AM HIIT.
Not the greatest idea in the world. Should always be pre-fuelled for best results.
| |
|
|
RE: AM HIIT - May 2 2008 10:19:23
| |
|
Jimmy23
Posts: 121
Joined: May 11 2007
Status: offline
|
oh. per some people on here i was under the impression that if you are un fuelled then the body will turn to fat stores and not burning off calories incurred during the day??
so when should you add cardio in?
| |
|
|
RE: AM HIIT - May 2 2008 10:42:02
| |
|
Integra
Posts: 7807
Joined: Sep. 23 2006
Status: offline
|
The above may or may not be true but HIIT as a form of cardio should always be fuelled.
| |
|
|
RE: AM HIIT - May 2 2008 11:56:29
| |
|
Gothic_Muscle
Posts: 838
Joined: Jun. 28 2005
From: South Wales
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Integra
The above may or may not be true but HIIT as a form of cardio should always be fuelled.
Agree. Hiit is very intense when done properly, I couldn't do it unfuelled!
_____________________________
Peace be the Journey!
| |
|
|
RE: AM HIIT - May 2 2008 12:51:06
| |
|
Jimmy23
Posts: 121
Joined: May 11 2007
Status: offline
|
Thanks peeps.
can you explain how HIIT should be performed??
Ta
| |
|
|
RE: AM HIIT - May 2 2008 19:38:30
| |
|
buzzer
Posts: 893
Joined: Jul. 26 2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Integra
The above may or may not be true but HIIT as a form of cardio should always be fuelled.
i agree but that depends on his goals.
if he isnt worried about muscle loss only fat then he can go ahead.
| |
|
|
RE: AM HIIT - May 2 2008 19:43:42
| |
|
jango
Posts: 3010
Joined: Feb. 26 2007
Status: online
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: buzzer
quote:
ORIGINAL: Integra
The above may or may not be true but HIIT as a form of cardio should always be fuelled.
i agree but that depends on his goals.
if he isnt worried about muscle loss only fat then he can go ahead.
But surely if done unfuelled he's likely to suffer issues with low blood sugar, dizziness etc. This has happened to me when trying out unfuelled hiit and it wasn't very pleasant.
| |
|
|
RE: AM HIIT - May 2 2008 19:46:54
| |
|
buzzer
Posts: 893
Joined: Jul. 26 2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: jango
quote:
ORIGINAL: buzzer
quote:
ORIGINAL: Integra
The above may or may not be true but HIIT as a form of cardio should always be fuelled.
i agree but that depends on his goals.
if he isnt worried about muscle loss only fat then he can go ahead.
But surely if done unfuelled he's likely to suffer issues with low blood sugar, dizziness etc. This has happened to me when trying out unfuelled hiit and it wasn't very pleasant.
maybe maybe not,lots of people have to work or train without food.
| |
|
|
RE: AM HIIT - May 3 2008 4:43:02
| |
|
Integra
Posts: 7807
Joined: Sep. 23 2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: buzzer
quote:
ORIGINAL: Integra
The above may or may not be true but HIIT as a form of cardio should always be fuelled.
i agree but that depends on his goals.
if he isnt worried about muscle loss only fat then he can go ahead.
I disagree.
Unfuelled = poorer performance = fewer calories burned = less weight loss.
This is undeniable.
Overall diet dictates the amount of weight lost, rendering unfuelled HIIT for weight loss less effective than pre-fuelling.
| |
|
|
RE: AM HIIT - May 3 2008 9:21:02
| |
|
buzzer
Posts: 893
Joined: Jul. 26 2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Integra
quote:
ORIGINAL: buzzer
quote:
ORIGINAL: Integra
The above may or may not be true but HIIT as a form of cardio should always be fuelled.
i agree but that depends on his goals.
if he isnt worried about muscle loss only fat then he can go ahead.
I disagree.
Unfuelled = poorer performance = fewer calories burned = less weight loss.
This is undeniable.
Overall diet dictates the amount of weight lost, rendering unfuelled HIIT for weight loss less effective than pre-fuelling.
i agree cals in versus cals out is the only way but" rendering unfuelled HIIT for weight loss less effective than pre-fuelling."that would also apply to ss-cardio.
| |
|
|
RE: AM HIIT - May 3 2008 10:01:25
| |
|
Integra
Posts: 7807
Joined: Sep. 23 2006
Status: offline
|
Overall calories dictate amount of weight lost, rendering unfuelled HIIT exercise less effective than fuelled HIIT because of the decrease in the level of performance (and amount of calories burned during and after exercise).
| |
|
|
RE: AM HIIT - May 3 2008 11:34:37
| |
|
buzzer
Posts: 893
Joined: Jul. 26 2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Integra
Overall calories dictate amount of weight lost, rendering unfuelled HIIT exercise less effective than fuelled HIIT because of the decrease in the level of performance (and amount of calories burned during and after exercise).
and same applies to unfueled or fueled ss-cardio.
| |
|
|
RE: AM HIIT - May 3 2008 11:45:27
| |
|
Rhez
Posts: 989
Joined: Feb. 6 2006
Status: online
|
Not sure about you guys but i would not have the energy to perform effective HIIT without pre fueling.
_____________________________
My Journal
| |
|
|
RE: AM HIIT - May 4 2008 1:21:55
| |
|
Integra
Posts: 7807
Joined: Sep. 23 2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
and same applies to unfueled or fueled ss-cardio.
SS cardio is less intense, immediate energy requirements are less of an issue. Meaning pre-fuelling is not a fundamental requirement.
quote:
ORIGINAL: Rhez
Not sure about you guys but i would not have the energy to perform effective HIIT without pre fueling.
Which is exactly what I was implying.
Sure you could try to do it, but it would be a half-arsed attempt with a lower calorie output than pre-fuelling.
| |
|
|
RE: AM HIIT - May 4 2008 10:29:44
| |
|
Rhez
Posts: 989
Joined: Feb. 6 2006
Status: online
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Integra
quote:
and same applies to unfueled or fueled ss-cardio.
SS cardio is less intense, immediate energy requirements are less of an issue. Meaning pre-fuelling is not a fundamental requirement.
quote:
ORIGINAL: Rhez
Not sure about you guys but i would not have the energy to perform effective HIIT without pre fueling.
Which is exactly what I was implying.
Sure you could try to do it, but it would be a half-arsed attempt with a lower calorie output than pre-fuelling.
Kinda new that, but was not to sure about the others.
_____________________________
My Journal
| |
|
|
RE: AM HIIT - May 6 2008 7:49:26
| |
|
buzzer
Posts: 893
Joined: Jul. 26 2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Integra
quote:
and same applies to unfueled or fueled ss-cardio.
SS cardio is less intense, immediate energy requirements are less of an issue. Meaning pre-fuelling is not a fundamental requirement.
quote:
ORIGINAL: Rhez
Not sure about you guys but i would not have the energy to perform effective HIIT without pre fueling.
Which is exactly what I was implying.
Sure you could try to do it, but it would be a half-arsed attempt with a lower calorie output than pre-fuelling.
i was talking about weight loss not performance,you can do both fuelled or infuelled,it wont make any difference if your in surplus you gain defecit you lose.
some people have no choice about fuelling,unless they are prepared to get up an hour earlier just to eat.
also prefulling for hiit/fatloss is not a fundemental requirement as you say performance yes fatloss not really.
< Message edited by buzzer -- May 6 2008 7:51:40 >
| |
|
|
RE: AM HIIT - May 6 2008 8:54:25
| |
|
CoNs
Posts: 4752
Joined: Sep. 18 2006
From: Dunfermline, Scotland
Status: offline
|
end of the day
hiit is meant to be max effort, if you dont have any fuel you cant put in your max effort simple as
even if by you were able to put in a respectful amount of effort, say bye to your muscle
if you want to try and risk it, do so, its your body and your muscle, but anyone with sense wouldnt sacrifice there muscle when its avoidable
_____________________________
**NEWSFLASH**
GLOBAL SHORTAGE OF WHEY!
PEOPLE REPORTED TO BE RESORTING TO FOOD AS A MEANS OF SURVIVING
| |
|
|
RE: AM HIIT - May 6 2008 9:06:48
| |
|
Integra
Posts: 7807
Joined: Sep. 23 2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
i was talking about weight loss not performance,you can do both fuelled or infuelled,it wont make any difference if your in surplus you gain defecit you lose.
some people have no choice about fuelling,unless they are prepared to get up an hour earlier just to eat.
also prefulling for hiit/fatloss is not a fundemental requirement as you say performance yes fatloss not really.
Everyone has a choice. They either do cardio fuelled or unfuelled.
HIIT unfuelled is not as effective as fuelled HIIT be it for fat loss or weight loss.
| |
|
|
RE: AM HIIT - May 6 2008 9:20:18
| |
|
buzzer
Posts: 893
Joined: Jul. 26 2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Integra
quote:
i was talking about weight loss not performance,you can do both fuelled or infuelled,it wont make any difference if your in surplus you gain defecit you lose.
some people have no choice about fuelling,unless they are prepared to get up an hour earlier just to eat.
also prefulling for hiit/fatloss is not a fundemental requirement as you say performance yes fatloss not really.
Everyone has a choice. They either do cardio fuelled or unfuelled.
HIIT unfuelled is not as effective as fuelled HIIT be it for fat loss or weight loss.
please explain why??? its cald in versus cals out not the type of cardio you do.
| |
|
|
Printable Version
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread