Bookmark this thread:     |
|
[Poll]
|
Rate This Physique III
|
| Excellent |
|
| Good |
|
| Above Average |
|
| Average |
|
| Below Average |
|
| Poor |
|
Total Votes : 87
|
(last vote on : May 11 2008 15:54:27)
(Poll will run till: -- )
|
|
Login  | |
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 17:31:36
| |
|
Scott32
Posts: 3455
Joined: Oct. 20 2005
From: England
Status: offline
|
Cant really tell to much from that picture but you can still tell he looks amazing.
Who is it steve brooks??
_____________________________
"When i let go of what i am, i become what i might be"
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 17:38:15
| |
|
cricket_fire
Posts: 4922
Joined: Oct. 9 2004
From: Ontario, Canada
Status: online
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: dazc
there are some seriously unrealistic opinions about how long it would take to get looking like that in this thread. maybe for the top 0.1% its achievable in a few years, but for most people its a much longer time than that.
lmao, that's what I was thinking when reading some of these posts. 2 years? Kiss my arse 2 years. Maybe if he was a powerlifter for 10 years before that 
_____________________________
Strength - Power - Hate
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 18:48:28
| |
|
Furyan
Posts: 4379
Joined: Jan. 30 2006
From: Swansea (Wales)
Status: offline
|
Made me giggle too, id go as far as saying your looking at well over 5 years training if you have excellent genetics, to get in that kind of shape.
Is it an ex mod?
_____________________________
Please sponser my other half today, in the race for life (Cancer research). Click the links!:
http://www.muscletalk.co.uk/m_2784655/tm.htm
http://www.raceforlifesponsorme.org/staceyjane
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 19:15:04
| |
|
James21
Posts: 1274
Joined: Aug. 16 2006
From: Greater Manchester
Status: offline
|
Excellent, really good proportions.
No idea how long it would take from someone to get in that condition varies from person to person etc.
Legs are only weakness in my opinion good size to them but the condition of them doe snot live up to the upper half unless its a bad picture.
I cant really comment anyway or criticise as i am years and years away from that sort of standard.
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 19:58:12
| |
|
dazc
Posts: 5370
Joined: Apr. 2 2003
From: United Kingdom
Status: online
|
i think the legs look slimmer than they actually are, due to the shape of the muscles, they are long and attatch close to the knee, someone whos come in higher up tend to have more of a belly on the muscle and makes it look bigger
_____________________________
treasurer of the ' NOT ALL MEN ARE BASTARDS' movement.
championing the cause of decent guys everywhere
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 20:03:18
| |
|
Jake
Posts: 2019
Joined: Oct. 29 2007
From: South Wales Posts:75823
Status: offline
|
Ask ****ing Phil Heath what's achievable in three years then!
_____________________________
Bodybuilding is a subculture of hyperbole. In its headlong rush to accrue flesh, everything about this subculture exploits grandiosity and excess.
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 20:16:04
| |
|
dazc
Posts: 5370
Joined: Apr. 2 2003
From: United Kingdom
Status: online
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Jake
Ask ****ing Phil Heath what's achievable in three years then!
any need for the swearing? does it add anything to the thread?
and like i said, its achievable for 0.1 % of people, not the mass majority.
_____________________________
treasurer of the ' NOT ALL MEN ARE BASTARDS' movement.
championing the cause of decent guys everywhere
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 20:20:22
| |
|
commando
Posts: 936
Joined: Jul. 9 2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: dazc
quote:
ORIGINAL: Jake
Ask ****ing Phil Heath what's achievable in three years then!
any need for the swearing? does it add anything to the thread?
and like i said, its achievable for 0.1 % of people, not the mass majority.
i agree mate
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 20:21:10
| |
|
Jake
Posts: 2019
Joined: Oct. 29 2007
From: South Wales Posts:75823
Status: offline
|
Who said this guy was the mass majority? And you've never sworn in a thread, ever?
All i said was he could get like this in 2 years MINIMum with perfect genetics? Then my post gets indirectly criticised!? WTF?
Who knows what is possible for an individual? He is no where near phil heath after his 3 years of training anyway.
_____________________________
Bodybuilding is a subculture of hyperbole. In its headlong rush to accrue flesh, everything about this subculture exploits grandiosity and excess.
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 20:24:54
| |
|
JohnKerr2
Posts: 7629
Joined: Jul. 14 2003
From: London United Kingdom
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Power Junkie
Fear The Raef
...and yes, I know the heads too big but I suck at PS.
Good job.
Tuc Biscuit is going to print this pic off and take it to bed tonight.
_____________________________
 Reported for insulting the Monarchy. 
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 20:27:05
| |
|
dazc
Posts: 5370
Joined: Apr. 2 2003
From: United Kingdom
Status: online
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Jake
Who said this guy was the mass majority? And you've never sworn in a thread, ever?
All i said was he could get like this in 2 years MINIMum with perfect genetics? Then my post gets indirectly criticised!? WTF?
Who knows what is possible for an individual? He is no where near phil heath after his 3 years of training anyway.
i never critisised your post, and even if i did, thats parf of the debate surely?
there were a few people (you included) that posted it would be possible to achieve this physique in a few years training, i posted and said that this was highly unrealistic for nearly everyone, most people couldnt get there after 10 years training let alone 2. but i conceded that it may be possible for a tiny proportion (hence the 0.1%) of people to do it in that time if everything was in place.
im not sure why you took so much offence at that.
maybe you could enlighten us with how long you have been training and the progress you have made?
_____________________________
treasurer of the ' NOT ALL MEN ARE BASTARDS' movement.
championing the cause of decent guys everywhere
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 20:28:57
| |
|
Power Junkie
Posts: 653
Joined: Jan. 8 2007
From: London
Status: offline
|
I've seen your PS work John and I'm impressed.
Maybe we can just mix and match heads on the body.
Gordon Brown. Tony Blair. Stephen Hawking.
_____________________________
"As seen on Crimewatch.”
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 20:45:42
| |
|
Jake
Posts: 2019
Joined: Oct. 29 2007
From: South Wales Posts:75823
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: dazc
quote:
ORIGINAL: Jake
Who said this guy was the mass majority? And you've never sworn in a thread, ever?
All i said was he could get like this in 2 years MINIMum with perfect genetics? Then my post gets indirectly criticised!? WTF?
Who knows what is possible for an individual? He is no where near phil heath after his 3 years of training anyway.
i never critisised your post, and even if i did, thats parf of the debate surely?
there were a few people (you included) that posted it would be possible to achieve this physique in a few years training, i posted and said that this was highly unrealistic for nearly everyone, most people couldnt get there after 10 years training let alone 2. but i conceded that it may be possible for a tiny proportion (hence the 0.1%) of people to do it in that time if everything was in place.
im not sure why you took so much offence at that.
maybe you could enlighten us with how long you have been training and the progress you have made?
Yes but it's your being a bit pedantic mate, If he ad amazing/out fo this world genetics, then who is to say with amazing training/diet/AAS that this is unrealistic in 2 years (MINIMUM  )!?
I didn't take offence, just got a bit over excited or something maybe? Nobody knows what the human body is capable of.
My training is on and of, due to a problem that i don't care to discuss..... But i'm 5'9'' and 92kg if that makes any difference at all, lol!?
Had 14.5-15" arms since i was about 14 years old, lats are very big, low lat insertions etc.... What do my genetics matter anywho?
Yourself? Care to enlighten me?
_____________________________
Bodybuilding is a subculture of hyperbole. In its headlong rush to accrue flesh, everything about this subculture exploits grandiosity and excess.
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 20:47:41
| |
|
JohnKerr2
Posts: 7629
Joined: Jul. 14 2003
From: London United Kingdom
Status: offline
|
_____________________________
Reported for insulting the Monarchy.
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 20:55:07
| |
|
T0NY
Posts: 6832
Joined: Feb. 8 2005
From: Bonny Scotland
Status: online
|
Very ****ing* impressive physique.
*just to annoy dazc
_____________________________
My journal
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 21:10:48
| |
|
Big D
Posts: 5984
Joined: May 3 2002
From: leeds
Status: offline
|
This thread is on its way to becoming like the one TT started about how old a girl was.
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 21:14:59
| |
|
tuc biscuit
Posts: 6184
Joined: Sep. 27 2003
From: Manchester UK Joined: Jun. 12 1993 Posts: 98675
Status: online
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: JohnKerr2
quote:
ORIGINAL: Power Junkie
Fear The Raef
...and yes, I know the heads too big but I suck at PS.
Good job.
Tuc Biscuit is going to print this pic off and take it to bed tonight.
lol, it did make me laugh, I do reckon Raef could win the Mr. Olympia within 3 years if he wanted
_____________________________
| |
|
|
Printable Version
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread