Rate This Physique III (Full Version)

All Forums >> [General] >> General >> Rate This Physique III


[Poll]

Rate This Physique III
Excellent
  71% (62)
Good
  20% (18)
Above Average
  1% (1)
Average
  1% (1)
Below Average
  2% (2)
Poor
  3% (3)


Total Votes : 87
(last vote on : May 11 2008 15:54:27)
(Poll will run till: -- )


Message
(for even more bodybuilding questions answered, check out the main forum at: www.MuscleTalk.co.uk)


PAGAN -> Rate This Physique III (May 8 2008 9:35:22)

Out of honest interest I'd like to know how people view this physique.I'll add more info once we have a few votes and a bit of input.

Any thoughts on how long it would take to achieve etc would be welcome too.


[image]http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/2813/rich1fu1.jpg[/image]




CoNs -> RE: Rate This Physique III (May 8 2008 9:38:38)

would of been better with a better pic

but he looks pretty damn good, well proportioned, not OTT, decent wheelz

Excellent


Incredible Bulk -> RE: Rate This Physique III (May 8 2008 9:40:20)

excellent...


tuc biscuit -> RE: Rate This Physique III (May 8 2008 9:41:46)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PAGAN

Out of honest interest I'd like to know how people view this physique.I'll add more info once we have a few votes and a bit of input.

Any thoughts on how long it would take to achieve etc would be welcome too.


[image]http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/2813/rich1fu1.jpg[/image]







very good, seems familiar


GOVINDA -> RE: Rate This Physique III (May 8 2008 9:43:22)

Im only novice, even at 40 but if i looked half as good you would never see me, id be in front of mirror


galenkia -> RE: Rate This Physique III (May 8 2008 9:43:36)

Excellent.

Good proportions and not excessively over-developed.


T_Dawg Jack -> RE: Rate This Physique III (May 8 2008 9:48:57)

Excellent.

Could even be natty at a push. (E.G. 15-20 years training experience).


Tiger81 -> RE: Rate This Physique III (May 8 2008 10:07:56)

I would say that he will be bigger in real life than he looks in that pic
i reckon that with a few years consistent training, good diet and well planned cycles that is acchievable


theiopener -> RE: Rate This Physique III (May 8 2008 10:10:05)

cracking physique IMO

as for time to get it 5-6 years id say

edit: who the hell voted poor [&:]


Roots -> RE: Rate This Physique III (May 8 2008 10:11:21)

is it just me who thinks the legs aren't at all great?

i'm talking size and condition.


cu3ed -> RE: Rate This Physique III (May 8 2008 10:12:32)

Excellant......which 3 put "poor" lol.


FromTheAshes -> RE: Rate This Physique III (May 8 2008 10:13:21)

lol@ 3 poors.

gotta love it.


theiopener -> RE: Rate This Physique III (May 8 2008 10:14:52)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Roots
is it just me who thinks the legs aren't at all great?

i'm talking size and condition.

compared to what exactly?


Roots -> RE: Rate This Physique III (May 8 2008 10:16:35)

as far as a competing BB physique i would say only mildly above average tbh. but then i can't see the back.

if i'm rating it as a physique in the context of the general population of course it would be excellent.


Incredible Bulk -> RE: Rate This Physique III (May 8 2008 10:16:44)

Lol at the poors...those in glass houses


Roots -> RE: Rate This Physique III (May 8 2008 10:18:13)

well compared to the average joe they are excellent. but the fact that he is stood on stage in posing pants makes it a little silly to rate i that manner.


theiopener -> RE: Rate This Physique III (May 8 2008 10:26:13)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Roots
as far as a competing BB physique i would say only mildly above average tbh. but then i can't see the back.

if i'm rating it as a physique in the context of the general population of course it would be excellent.

in what class? Very broad range of classes mate in competing BB'ers. Granted you cant see his back but he looks in proportion and in good condition all the same which IMO is what its all about


H20 -> RE: Rate This Physique III (May 8 2008 10:32:15)

From that picture, excellent, if I`m being picky Calves are over-shadowed a bit by the rest of his physique, similar shape to mine in fact.

How long, mmm hard to say, a lad I used to train with many years ago was in similar size and condition after 3 years with little gear use but he would be an exception rather than a rule, many others I`d go for 5-10 years all being well.


Roots -> RE: Rate This Physique III (May 8 2008 10:42:01)


quote:

ORIGINAL: theiopener

quote:

ORIGINAL: Roots
as far as a competing BB physique i would say only mildly above average tbh. but then i can't see the back.

if i'm rating it as a physique in the context of the general population of course it would be excellent.

in what class? Very broad range of classes mate in competing BB'ers. Granted you cant see his back but he looks in proportion and in good condition all the same which IMO is what its all about


well as the context is which we should rate is not mentioned i am simply comparing him mentally to similar physiques size wise i have seen.

for my personal taste i would like to see more detail and size in the legs and i feel similarly about the chest but would need to see another pose to judge properly on that.


mick_the_brick -> RE: Rate This Physique III (May 8 2008 11:01:12)


Cracking


Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>

© Muscle Talk Bodybuilding Forum

Check out the main forum at: www.MuscleTalk.co.uk


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition