Bookmark this thread:     |
|
[Poll]
|
Rate This Physique III
|
| Excellent |
|
| Good |
|
| Above Average |
|
| Average |
|
| Below Average |
|
| Poor |
|
Total Votes : 87
|
(last vote on : May 11 2008 15:54:27)
(Poll will run till: -- )
|
|
Login  | |
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 9:38:38
| |
|
CoNs
Posts: 4751
Joined: Sep. 18 2006
From: Dunfermline, Scotland
Status: offline
|
would of been better with a better pic
but he looks pretty damn good, well proportioned, not OTT, decent wheelz
Excellent
_____________________________
**NEWSFLASH**
GLOBAL SHORTAGE OF WHEY!
PEOPLE REPORTED TO BE RESORTING TO FOOD AS A MEANS OF SURVIVING
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 9:41:46
| |
|
tuc biscuit
Posts: 5488
Joined: Sep. 27 2003
From: Manchester UK Joined: Jun. 12 1993 Posts: 25675
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: PAGAN
Out of honest interest I'd like to know how people view this physique.I'll add more info once we have a few votes and a bit of input.
Any thoughts on how long it would take to achieve etc would be welcome too.
very good, seems familiar
_____________________________
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 9:43:22
| |
|
GOVINDA
Posts: 83
Joined: May 4 2008
From: Belfast, United Kingdom
Status: offline
|
Im only novice, even at 40 but if i looked half as good you would never see me, id be in front of mirror
_____________________________
"dam you pesky kids" the irishman said to scooby and the gang, then he pulled out a sawn off and blew their smug faces off.
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 9:43:36
| |
|
galenkia
Posts: 2496
Joined: Nov. 7 2006
From: Loftus Road
Status: offline
|
Excellent.
Good proportions and not excessively over-developed.
_____________________________
Oh No!!!.
We got Dowie!!!.
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 9:48:57
| |
|
T_Dawg Jack
Posts: 1027
Joined: Nov. 20 2004
From: What business is it of yours where I come from?
Status: online
|
Excellent.
Could even be natty at a push. (E.G. 15-20 years training experience).
_____________________________
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 10:07:56
| |
|
Tiger81
Posts: 2457
Joined: Jun. 25 2004
From: Scotland, Home of the brave.
Status: offline
|
I would say that he will be bigger in real life than he looks in that pic
i reckon that with a few years consistent training, good diet and well planned cycles that is acchievable
_____________________________
Knowledge is power...keep educating yourself!
Train smart - leave your ego at the door.
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 10:10:05
| |
|
theiopener
Posts: 18219
Joined: Jan. 6 2007
Status: offline
|
cracking physique IMO
as for time to get it 5-6 years id say
edit: who the hell voted poor 
< Message edited by theiopener -- May 8 2008 10:11:02 >
_____________________________
Journal
www.healthyaction.co.uk
www.undergroundmuscle.co.uk
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 10:11:21
| |
|
Roots
Posts: 1267
Joined: Jan. 27 2008
From: Telford W Midlands
Status: online
|
is it just me who thinks the legs aren't at all great?
i'm talking size and condition.
_____________________________
from solid roots-a journal
quote:
ORIGINAL: Titch
So to sum up, the KFC girl has a Boneless Bucket.
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 10:12:32
| |
|
cu3ed
Posts: 19320
Joined: Sep. 2 2004
From: Beneifit Fraud Agency with Phoenix
Status: offline
|
Excellant......which 3 put "poor" lol.
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 10:13:21
| |
|
FromTheAshes
Posts: 1172
Joined: Mar. 2 2007
Status: offline
|
lol@ 3 poors.
gotta love it.
_____________________________
Excuse me, miss, but does this cloth smell like chloroform?
"Subtly evil"
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 10:16:35
| |
|
Roots
Posts: 1267
Joined: Jan. 27 2008
From: Telford W Midlands
Status: online
|
as far as a competing BB physique i would say only mildly above average tbh. but then i can't see the back.
if i'm rating it as a physique in the context of the general population of course it would be excellent.
_____________________________
from solid roots-a journal
quote:
ORIGINAL: Titch
So to sum up, the KFC girl has a Boneless Bucket.
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 10:18:13
| |
|
Roots
Posts: 1267
Joined: Jan. 27 2008
From: Telford W Midlands
Status: online
|
well compared to the average joe they are excellent. but the fact that he is stood on stage in posing pants makes it a little silly to rate i that manner.
_____________________________
from solid roots-a journal
quote:
ORIGINAL: Titch
So to sum up, the KFC girl has a Boneless Bucket.
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 10:26:13
| |
|
theiopener
Posts: 18219
Joined: Jan. 6 2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Roots
as far as a competing BB physique i would say only mildly above average tbh. but then i can't see the back.
if i'm rating it as a physique in the context of the general population of course it would be excellent.
in what class? Very broad range of classes mate in competing BB'ers. Granted you cant see his back but he looks in proportion and in good condition all the same which IMO is what its all about
_____________________________
Journal
www.healthyaction.co.uk
www.undergroundmuscle.co.uk
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 10:32:15
| |
|
H20
Posts: 7203
Joined: Jun. 23 2004
From: Manchester England
Status: online
|
From that picture, excellent, if I`m being picky Calves are over-shadowed a bit by the rest of his physique, similar shape to mine in fact.
How long, mmm hard to say, a lad I used to train with many years ago was in similar size and condition after 3 years with little gear use but he would be an exception rather than a rule, many others I`d go for 5-10 years all being well.
_____________________________
Look after your body,it is the greatest thing you will EVER own----Bazil Baines
Dodging the rain and bullets since 1966.
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 10:42:01
| |
|
Roots
Posts: 1267
Joined: Jan. 27 2008
From: Telford W Midlands
Status: online
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: theiopener
quote:
ORIGINAL: Roots
as far as a competing BB physique i would say only mildly above average tbh. but then i can't see the back.
if i'm rating it as a physique in the context of the general population of course it would be excellent.
in what class? Very broad range of classes mate in competing BB'ers. Granted you cant see his back but he looks in proportion and in good condition all the same which IMO is what its all about
well as the context is which we should rate is not mentioned i am simply comparing him mentally to similar physiques size wise i have seen.
for my personal taste i would like to see more detail and size in the legs and i feel similarly about the chest but would need to see another pose to judge properly on that.
_____________________________
from solid roots-a journal
quote:
ORIGINAL: Titch
So to sum up, the KFC girl has a Boneless Bucket.
| |
|
|
RE: Rate This Physique III - May 8 2008 11:01:12
| |
|
mick_the_brick
Posts: 13506
Joined: Sep. 29 2006
From: North East - UK
Status: offline
|
Cracking
_____________________________
SUPERMOD @ http://www.underground-muscle.co.uk
quote:
ORIGINAL: cLaTTeReD
tell your "friend" not to be a pecker and do some test
Performance Enhancing Drug Member of the year 2007
| |
|
|
Printable Version
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread