tigernut
Posts: 2637
Joined: Jul. 17 2007 From: plymouth SW england Status: offline
 |
quote:
ORIGINAL: Clubber Lang quote:
ORIGINAL: mick_the_brick I prefer Sust over test c / test e I hold no water on sust... Also get better strength gains and more horn ditto sust kicks in roughly straight away were as ur waiting and waiting for test E. Wouldnt bother me if i never used test E again tbf. is there really that much of a difference? also, does cycle length play a part? i'm wondering if testE may be better for lengthier cycles if what your saying is true, or is the only benefit of testE the lack of shot pain from the lack of prop? (which personally i dont find anything like as bad now i've added a bit of DECA to the shot) why are people choosing to use testE if the above is true from you 2? i mean, price wise is pretty much the same (all i will say on that) yet strength wise you tend to find sust with more mg per ml and at least as much as test E (250mg/ml) so i cant understand the logic of using it if your waiting on for it to kick in for a lifetime. i thought the wait with the sust was comparitively long enough (i've only a history of oral use prior to sust) puzzled me this now. test E is so very popular it would seem, so why?
_____________________________
x-fire gaming nickname - tigernut. and tell me ya from MT cos i'll deleted ya if ya dont! :)
|