Change Page:
12 > | Showing page 1 of 2, messages 1 to 20 of 34
Simon_T
-
Total Posts
:
86
-
Reward points
:
751
- Joined: 05/11/2007
-
Status: offline
|
Is this a good 600cal PWO shake
-
05 June 2008 21:06
500ml skimmed milk 1 Banana 40g whey powder 40g malto-dextrin Any good?
|
|
daveo
-
Total Posts
:
3630
-
Reward points
:
2153
- Joined: 10/01/2006
- Location: London
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Is this a good 600cal PWO shake
-
06 June 2008 10:20
Looks good to me.
|
|
Chris M
-
Total Posts
:
609
-
Reward points
:
1687
- Joined: 17/08/2006
- Location: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Is this a good 600cal PWO shake
-
07 June 2008 18:03
May suggest changing the sugar for ground oats.
|
|
Dazzler69
-
Total Posts
:
680
-
Reward points
:
998
- Joined: 16/08/2007
- Location: Portsmouth Now Living In Hailsham, East Sussex
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Is this a good 600cal PWO shake
-
07 June 2008 19:16
ORIGINAL: Chris M May suggest changing the sugar for ground oats. Even post workout???
Ain't Nothin But A Peanut!!
|
|
AlasTTTair
-
Total Posts
:
2448
-
Reward points
:
1360
- Joined: 01/03/2007
- Location: Liverpool
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Is this a good 600cal PWO shake
-
07 June 2008 19:34
Couple of weird responses IMO. Doesn't look good to me. No need for a 600cal PWO shake. No need for the milk (slows adsorption and contains fat). Banana and malto is fine, but personally I'd just slightly up the malto or have 30g malto, 30g dextrose. Chris M Do you understand the requirements of a PWO shake, particularly the ideal characteristics of the carbs?
I'm a wizard of the word, that's what you heard And anything else is quite absurd
|
|
Simon_T
-
Total Posts
:
86
-
Reward points
:
751
- Joined: 05/11/2007
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Is this a good 600cal PWO shake
-
10 June 2008 21:06
I'm pretty new to eating properly so I only know the basics, fast acting (whey) protein and fast acting carbs (malto-dext, dextrose or white bread) after a weights workout, is pretty much all i know The reason i wanted 600 cals is because i'm eating 6 meals a day all at 600 cals, so thought this could be one of them.
|
|
Losso
-
Total Posts
:
96
-
Reward points
:
840
- Joined: 05/11/2007
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Is this a good 600cal PWO shake
-
11 June 2008 01:17
pwo shldnt be counted as one of ur 6 meals, it shld jst be a fast injection of carbs n protein, to help muscle repair, this shld be taken imediatly after workout, then a meal within the hour 2. for example mine is, 2 scoops protein, 1 scoop wms in water. followed by a full meal 40 mins later.
|
|
danchubbz
-
Total Posts
:
2387
-
Reward points
:
1449
- Joined: 12/01/2007
- Location: Cardiff
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Is this a good 600cal PWO shake
-
11 June 2008 11:38
Do u have a PPWO meal an hour so later or is this the only PWO meal and u eat again in a few hoursas normal?
|
|
AlasTTTair
-
Total Posts
:
2448
-
Reward points
:
1360
- Joined: 01/03/2007
- Location: Liverpool
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Is this a good 600cal PWO shake
-
11 June 2008 18:32
ORIGINAL: Losso pwo shldnt be counted as one of ur 6 meals, it shld jst be a fast injection of carbs n protein, to help muscle repair, this shld be taken imediatly after workout, then a meal within the hour 2. for example mine is, 2 scoops protein, 1 scoop wms in water. followed by a full meal 40 mins later. Agree with this, except I'd revered the ratio of protein to WMS. He's right tho, 6 meals EXCLUDING your PWO shake. The PWO shake should be the only real change in diet between the two days unless a) you're cutting or b) you're carb insensitive and need to watch your carb intake.
I'm a wizard of the word, that's what you heard And anything else is quite absurd
|
|
Ak_88
-
Total Posts
:
12757
-
Reward points
:
2316
- Joined: 06/11/2005
- Location: Chelmsford, Essex
-
Status: online
|
RE: Is this a good 600cal PWO shake
-
11 June 2008 19:13
ORIGINAL: AlasTTTair Couple of weird responses IMO. Doesn't look good to me. No need for a 600cal PWO shake. No need for the milk (slows adsorption and contains fat). Banana and malto is fine, but personally I'd just slightly up the malto or have 30g malto, 30g dextrose. Chris M Do you understand the requirements of a PWO shake, particularly the ideal characteristics of the carbs? I doubt you'd notice any difference in results from having sugar or oats in your PWO shake.
|
|
theiopener
-
Total Posts
:
23143
-
Reward points
:
1472
- Joined: 06/01/2007
- Location: My kitchen, fanning the flames ;)
-
Status: online
|
RE: Is this a good 600cal PWO shake
-
11 June 2008 19:19
ORIGINAL: AlasTTTair Couple of weird responses IMO. Doesn't look good to me. No need for a 600cal PWO shake. No need for the milk (slows adsorption and contains fat). Banana and malto is fine, but personally I'd just slightly up the malto or have 30g malto, 30g dextrose. Chris M Do you understand the requirements of a PWO shake, particularly the ideal characteristics of the carbs? Question is mate do you understand the requirements of a PWO shake? I agree with what has been said by everyone else. oats, bananas, milk and whatever else is fine to use. only thing i would avoid PWO is crap fats personally
[link=http://tinyurl.com/5lwwh9][image]http://i33.tinypic.com/1yg6r
|
|
Simon_T
-
Total Posts
:
86
-
Reward points
:
751
- Joined: 05/11/2007
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Is this a good 600cal PWO shake
-
11 June 2008 21:01
I normally have a meal within 2 hours of my PWO shake.
|
|
AlasTTTair
-
Total Posts
:
2448
-
Reward points
:
1360
- Joined: 01/03/2007
- Location: Liverpool
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Is this a good 600cal PWO shake
-
11 June 2008 21:31
ORIGINAL: theiopener ORIGINAL: AlasTTTair Couple of weird responses IMO. Doesn't look good to me. No need for a 600cal PWO shake. No need for the milk (slows adsorption and contains fat). Banana and malto is fine, but personally I'd just slightly up the malto or have 30g malto, 30g dextrose. Chris M Do you understand the requirements of a PWO shake, particularly the ideal characteristics of the carbs? Question is mate do you understand the requirements of a PWO shake? I agree with what has been said by everyone else. oats, bananas, milk and whatever else is fine to use. only thing i would avoid PWO is crap fats personally Answer is, IDEAL characteristics would be fast acting carbs and protein, as much as possible going towards replenishing muscle glycogen and sending protein to the muscles. Seeing as you want something that will replenish the muscles as quickly as possible, I'd say something like...oh I don't know...glucose (and whey) Not saying its necessary or essential, but it is ideal. Like Steve used to say, it probably produces very little tangible difference, but if it makes you lose 1% efficiency, it only takes another 9 "Oh this'll do"s and you're only performing at 90% efficiency. We're discussing what's ideal here Eddie, not just what's suitable
I'm a wizard of the word, that's what you heard And anything else is quite absurd
|
|
Losso
-
Total Posts
:
96
-
Reward points
:
840
- Joined: 05/11/2007
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Is this a good 600cal PWO shake
-
11 June 2008 21:39
ORIGINAL: AlasTTTair ORIGINAL: Losso pwo shldnt be counted as one of ur 6 meals, it shld jst be a fast injection of carbs n protein, to help muscle repair, this shld be taken imediatly after workout, then a meal within the hour 2. for example mine is, 2 scoops protein, 1 scoop wms in water. followed by a full meal 40 mins later. Agree with this, except I'd revered the ratio of protein to WMS. He's right tho, 6 meals EXCLUDING your PWO shake. The PWO shake should be the only real change in diet between the two days unless a) you're cutting or b) you're carb insensitive and need to watch your carb intake. yer ive been thinking about upping the WMS, thanks for your input, sorry for hijack, think ill put 2 scoops of wms in:)
|
|
danchubbz
-
Total Posts
:
2387
-
Reward points
:
1449
- Joined: 12/01/2007
- Location: Cardiff
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Is this a good 600cal PWO shake
-
11 June 2008 22:37
ORIGINAL: AlasTTTair ORIGINAL: theiopener ORIGINAL: AlasTTTair Couple of weird responses IMO. Doesn't look good to me. No need for a 600cal PWO shake. No need for the milk (slows adsorption and contains fat). Banana and malto is fine, but personally I'd just slightly up the malto or have 30g malto, 30g dextrose. Chris M Do you understand the requirements of a PWO shake, particularly the ideal characteristics of the carbs? Question is mate do you understand the requirements of a PWO shake? I agree with what has been said by everyone else. oats, bananas, milk and whatever else is fine to use. only thing i would avoid PWO is crap fats personally Answer is, IDEAL characteristics would be fast acting carbs and protein, as much as possible going towards replenishing muscle glycogen and sending protein to the muscles. Seeing as you want something that will replenish the muscles as quickly as possible, I'd say something like...oh I don't know...glucose (and whey) Not saying its necessary or essential, but it is ideal. Like Steve used to say, it probably produces very little tangible difference, but if it makes you lose 1% efficiency, it only takes another 9 "Oh this'll do"s and you're only performing at 90% efficiency. We're discussing what's ideal here Eddie, not just what's suitable He mentions he doesn't eat then for another 2 hrs so is dex/whey ideal?
|
|
AlasTTTair
-
Total Posts
:
2448
-
Reward points
:
1360
- Joined: 01/03/2007
- Location: Liverpool
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Is this a good 600cal PWO shake
-
12 June 2008 10:59
ORIGINAL: danchubbz ORIGINAL: AlasTTTair ORIGINAL: theiopener ORIGINAL: AlasTTTair Couple of weird responses IMO. Doesn't look good to me. No need for a 600cal PWO shake. No need for the milk (slows adsorption and contains fat). Banana and malto is fine, but personally I'd just slightly up the malto or have 30g malto, 30g dextrose. Chris M Do you understand the requirements of a PWO shake, particularly the ideal characteristics of the carbs? Question is mate do you understand the requirements of a PWO shake? I agree with what has been said by everyone else. oats, bananas, milk and whatever else is fine to use. only thing i would avoid PWO is crap fats personally Answer is, IDEAL characteristics would be fast acting carbs and protein, as much as possible going towards replenishing muscle glycogen and sending protein to the muscles. Seeing as you want something that will replenish the muscles as quickly as possible, I'd say something like...oh I don't know...glucose (and whey) Not saying its necessary or essential, but it is ideal. Like Steve used to say, it probably produces very little tangible difference, but if it makes you lose 1% efficiency, it only takes another 9 "Oh this'll do"s and you're only performing at 90% efficiency. We're discussing what's ideal here Eddie, not just what's suitable He mentions he doesn't eat then for another 2 hrs so is dex/whey ideal? The PWO shake I suggested is ideal in and of itself. Eating 2 hours afterwards is not ideal. However, I don't see how still having the dextrose/ whey would he a problem as his muscles would be instantly replenished and his insulin spiked, so little, if any catabolism is likely to take place. Like I said, it's not essential, but it is ideal for rapidly replenishing muscles.
I'm a wizard of the word, that's what you heard And anything else is quite absurd
|
|
theiopener
-
Total Posts
:
23143
-
Reward points
:
1472
- Joined: 06/01/2007
- Location: My kitchen, fanning the flames ;)
-
Status: online
|
RE: Is this a good 600cal PWO shake
-
12 June 2008 11:24
ORIGINAL: AlasTTTair Answer is, IDEAL characteristics would be fast acting carbs and protein, as much as possible going towards replenishing muscle glycogen and sending protein to the muscles. Seeing as you want something that will replenish the muscles as quickly as possible, I'd say something like...oh I don't know...glucose (and whey) Not saying its necessary or essential, but it is ideal. Like Steve used to say, it probably produces very little tangible difference, but if it makes you lose 1% efficiency, it only takes another 9 "Oh this'll do"s and you're only performing at 90% efficiency. We're discussing what's ideal here Eddie, not just what's suitable But what is the meaning of ideal? ideal in what aspect? does a 5% increase in effort result in a overall positive difference of 5% or is it less than that? He doesn't need fast carbs or fast protein because hey guess what, hes still got stuff sitting in hit gut from prior being digested. Muscle glycogen and repair isn't a NOW NOW NOW thing mate, glycogen will be refilled with his PWO meal if he doesn't use a shake and recovery is over days not minutes and hours. He also doesn't need to replenish glycogen quickly unless hes planning on doing HIT or some other form of high intensity exercise and doesn't have time to wait for slow carbs to do the job What Steve said and what Steve did were two separate things mate, him, and countless others are not gurus to be listened to and never questioned. What he did resulted in him having no life outside of his training, did that not dawn on anyone else who were trying to apply his methods to the letter T. 90% or 100%, who cares what it looks like on paper, real world tangible results matter, nothing else
<message edited by theiopener on 12 June 2008 11:27>
[link=http://tinyurl.com/5lwwh9][image]http://i33.tinypic.com/1yg6r
|
|
Dazzler69
-
Total Posts
:
680
-
Reward points
:
998
- Joined: 16/08/2007
- Location: Portsmouth Now Living In Hailsham, East Sussex
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Is this a good 600cal PWO shake
-
12 June 2008 17:03
ORIGINAL: theiopener ORIGINAL: AlasTTTair Answer is, IDEAL characteristics would be fast acting carbs and protein, as much as possible going towards replenishing muscle glycogen and sending protein to the muscles. Seeing as you want something that will replenish the muscles as quickly as possible, I'd say something like...oh I don't know...glucose (and whey) Not saying its necessary or essential, but it is ideal. Like Steve used to say, it probably produces very little tangible difference, but if it makes you lose 1% efficiency, it only takes another 9 "Oh this'll do"s and you're only performing at 90% efficiency. We're discussing what's ideal here Eddie, not just what's suitable But what is the meaning of ideal? ideal in what aspect? does a 5% increase in effort result in a overall positive difference of 5% or is it less than that? He doesn't need fast carbs or fast protein because hey guess what, hes still got stuff sitting in hit gut from prior being digested. Muscle glycogen and repair isn't a NOW NOW NOW thing mate, glycogen will be refilled with his PWO meal if he doesn't use a shake and recovery is over days not minutes and hours. He also doesn't need to replenish glycogen quickly unless hes planning on doing HIT or some other form of high intensity exercise and doesn't have time to wait for slow carbs to do the job What Steve said and what Steve did were two separate things mate, him, and countless others are not gurus to be listened to and never questioned. What he did resulted in him having no life outside of his training, did that not dawn on anyone else who were trying to apply his methods to the letter T. 90% or 100%, who cares what it looks like on paper, real world tangible results matter, nothing else I dont know who Steve is but I do agree with this, and unless your a pro bodybuilder or something getting to stressed over things like that can be quite detrimental
Ain't Nothin But A Peanut!!
|
|
theiopener
-
Total Posts
:
23143
-
Reward points
:
1472
- Joined: 06/01/2007
- Location: My kitchen, fanning the flames ;)
-
Status: online
|
RE: Is this a good 600cal PWO shake
-
12 June 2008 17:28
Dazzler Steve is/was TT/Marmite etc
[link=http://tinyurl.com/5lwwh9][image]http://i33.tinypic.com/1yg6r
|
|
phil nosko
-
Total Posts
:
602
-
Reward points
:
1598
- Joined: 11/09/2006
- Location: Andover
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Is this a good 600cal PWO shake
-
17 June 2008 09:51
ORIGINAL: theiopener He doesn't need fast carbs or fast protein because hey guess what, hes still got stuff sitting in hit gut from prior being digested. Muscle glycogen and repair isn't a NOW NOW NOW thing mate, glycogen will be refilled with his PWO meal if he doesn't use a shake and recovery is over days not minutes and hours. I disagree TIO. I think muscle glycogen and repair IS a now now now thing. After a hard workout cortisol is at a high point and consuming fast acting carbs and a little protein will help to blunt this and also to increase insulin. I think the sooner you do this after a workout the better.
|
|