
Welcome to MuscleTalk !
| Sponsor Message |
 | Diet Supplements Revealed Thanks to this insider information some 15,000 people like YOU have won the fight against false advertising claims |
|
Change Page: 12 > | Showing page 1 of 2, messages 1 to 20 of 21
|
Author |
Message
|
Antro
-
Total Posts
:
54
-
Reward points
:
334
- Joined: 03/03/2008
-
Status: offline
|
amir khan1.5% bodyfat???
-
21 June 2008 22:59
missed it myself, but my bro has been watching the build up for his fight, he says it said that amir khan is 1.5% bodyfat??? do u think this is true??? i know you have to be lean, but i box and i've alway been told go no less than 6-8%. thoughts???
Eat Right, Sleep Right, Train Right, Don't let anybody tell you different!
|
|
JamesR
-
Total Posts
:
705
-
Reward points
:
2417
- Joined: 15/09/2005
-
Status: offline
|
RE: amir khan1.5% bodyfat???
-
21 June 2008 23:00
My thoughts are that i posted this before you
|
|
Antro
-
Total Posts
:
54
-
Reward points
:
334
- Joined: 03/03/2008
-
Status: offline
|
RE: amir khan1.5% bodyfat???
-
21 June 2008 23:02
ha ha did u, missed that, will have a look
|
|
CheekyChappie
-
Total Posts
:
3021
-
Reward points
:
4866
- Joined: 08/04/2002
- Location: United Kingdom
-
Status: offline
|
RE: amir khan1.5% bodyfat???
-
21 June 2008 23:11
Just shows you can be a top athlete and still be ****ing clueless on stuff like this. He looks about 9-10% to me.
|
|
Wrongun
-
Total Posts
:
3964
-
Reward points
:
5360
- Joined: 09/09/2001
- Location: United Kingdom
-
Status: offline
|
RE: amir khan1.5% bodyfat???
-
21 June 2008 23:51
He is lean due to his weight class but certainly not 1.5% Would say more 6% which IMHO is low for a fighter and he will move up a class post winning a title Wrongun!
|
|
Yohimbe
-
Total Posts
:
1863
-
Reward points
:
506
- Joined: 10/05/2008
-
Status: offline
|
RE: amir khan1.5% bodyfat???
-
22 June 2008 00:03
I taught a new year 9 class t'other day that didn't know that 2/8 is the same as 1/4 or what half of 90 is. Perhaps Khan just got his percentages confused!
<message edited by Yohimbe on 22 June 2008 00:04>
|
|
wolverine198324
-
Total Posts
:
439
-
Reward points
:
272
- Joined: 03/04/2008
-
Status: offline
|
RE: amir khan1.5% bodyfat???
-
22 June 2008 00:04
seen more meat on a butchers pencil
|
|
AlasTTTair
-
Total Posts
:
2492
-
Reward points
:
1390
- Joined: 01/03/2007
- Location: Liverpool
-
Status: offline
|
RE: amir khan1.5% bodyfat???
-
22 June 2008 00:20
ORIGINAL: wolverine198324 seen more meat on a butchers pencil Does he claim to be a bodybuilder?
I'm a wizard of the word, that's what you heard And anything else is quite absurd
|
|
wolverine198324
-
Total Posts
:
439
-
Reward points
:
272
- Joined: 03/04/2008
-
Status: offline
|
RE: amir khan1.5% bodyfat???
-
22 June 2008 00:23
No but still who wants to watch a fckin toothpick swingin a couple of twigs with gloves about.
|
|
Integra
-
Total Posts
:
9886
-
Reward points
:
1701
- Joined: 23/09/2006
-
Status: offline
|
RE: amir khan1.5% bodyfat???
-
22 June 2008 00:25
ORIGINAL: wolverine198324 No but still who wants to watch a fckin toothpick swingin a couple of twigs with gloves about. 10000 people in the National Indoor Arena and thousands more via ITV?
|
|
kinglean
-
Total Posts
:
2862
-
Reward points
:
4074
- Joined: 25/06/2003
- Location: United Kingdom
-
Status: offline
|
RE: amir khan1.5% bodyfat???
-
22 June 2008 00:27
ORIGINAL: wolverine198324 No but still who wants to watch a fckin toothpick swingin a couple of twigs with gloves about. What are you saying mate? Any boxer under cruiserweight is not worth watching?
|
|
beef_pumper
-
Total Posts
:
556
-
Reward points
:
1452
- Joined: 24/01/2007
- Location: Gloucester
-
Status: offline
|
RE: amir khan1.5% bodyfat???
-
22 June 2008 00:34
WTF you on about?? I thought it was a great fight, much more exciting than two huge guys sluggin it out.
|
|
wolverine198324
-
Total Posts
:
439
-
Reward points
:
272
- Joined: 03/04/2008
-
Status: offline
|
RE: amir khan1.5% bodyfat???
-
22 June 2008 00:50
10,000 aye, would be worldwide if it was heavyweight!
|
|
Chriss
-
Total Posts
:
1331
-
Reward points
:
2231
- Joined: 17/10/2005
-
Status: offline
|
RE: amir khan1.5% bodyfat???
-
22 June 2008 00:53
was just about to post up about his 1.5% comment. i was laughing saying hed probs be dead if he was 1.5% my mates were like huh? surely hes zero% cuz hes ripped.... lol
|
|
CutnRip
-
Total Posts
:
266
-
Reward points
:
537
- Joined: 06/04/2008
- Location: Manchester
-
Status: offline
|
RE: amir khan1.5% bodyfat???
-
22 June 2008 00:59
he does steroids, he's a sneaky little cheat, skilled guy though, but i reckon he's on summat  boxing can be corrupt.
|
|
beef_pumper
-
Total Posts
:
556
-
Reward points
:
1452
- Joined: 24/01/2007
- Location: Gloucester
-
Status: offline
|
RE: amir khan1.5% bodyfat???
-
22 June 2008 01:00
ORIGINAL: wolverine198324 10,000 aye, would be worldwide if it was heavyweight! Worldwide for a Commonwealth title fight, yeah right.
|
|
indie
-
Total Posts
:
359
-
Reward points
:
1112
- Joined: 02/07/2007
-
Status: offline
|
RE: amir khan1.5% bodyfat???
-
22 June 2008 02:47
No chance, Anything under 4% is a shredded physique. Shredded is beyond ripped, when an individual is shredded you will see every muscle fibre, every sinew, every vein and striation. Amir khan certainly isn't shredded. As already said, he's maybe around 9% but not anywhere near 1.5%, If they said that on the Tv, they are telling porkie pies!
<message edited by indie on 22 June 2008 03:09>
|
|
mrmmonster
-
Total Posts
:
3813
-
Reward points
:
2832
- Joined: 06/03/2005
- Location: newcastle, uk
-
Status: offline
|
RE: amir khan1.5% bodyfat???
-
22 June 2008 03:45
ORIGINAL: wolverine198324 10,000 aye, would be worldwide if it was heavyweight! dont be silly no-one watches heavy weight anymore!!! its sh*t!!! id much rather watch a Khan or Hatton fight than a heavyweight fight now cos there's no real contenders anymore!!! he does steroids, he's a sneaky little cheat, skilled guy though, but i reckon he's on summat boxing can be corrupt. stop talking!!! i hope ur joking!! khan is never on gear so please stop bein silly!!!
|
|
American Dream
-
Total Posts
:
748
-
Reward points
:
1176
- Joined: 07/01/2007
- Location: UK
-
Status: offline
|
RE: amir khan1.5% bodyfat???
-
22 June 2008 09:49
Heavyweights are ****e, all they do is swing three blows and then hold onto each other cause theyre fcukd. I think Wolverine you underestimate even a lightweights ability, if he planted you with a combo you'd know about it. Good fight btw they picked a decent opponent for once, he had some grit about him and gave Kahn something different to think about. Kahn chin is still suspect but his hand speed and combo's are up there with the best.
|
|
Integra
-
Total Posts
:
9886
-
Reward points
:
1701
- Joined: 23/09/2006
-
Status: offline
|
RE: amir khan1.5% bodyfat???
-
22 June 2008 10:04
Kahn chin is still suspect but his hand speed and combo's are up there with the best. Handspeed yes, combos no. Khan looks slick when the fight is at a range that he is comfortable with. He does not have a clue how to fight on the inside and it looks like a flaw that would take years to rectify. A top class operator will ruin him unless he improves a lot.
|
|
|
Current active users
|
There are 0 members and 1 guests.
|
Icon Legend and Permission
|
-
New Messages
-
No New Messages
-
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
-
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
-
Locked w/ New Messages
-
Locked w/o New Messages
|
-
Read Message
-
Post New Thread
-
Reply to message
-
Post New Poll
-
Submit Vote
-
Post reward post
-
Delete my own posts
-
Delete my own threads
-
Rate post
|
|
© 2000-2008 ASPPlayground.NET Forum Version 3.1.5

|