Welcome to MuscleTalk !
Sponsor Message
Muscle Finesse
Only the best brands
FREE DELIVERY!
Prev Thread Prev Thread   Next Thread Next Thread
 better for size???????
Author Message
carl19

  • Total Posts : 2985
  • Reward points : 1551
  • Joined: 24/09/2006
  • Status: offline
better for size??????? - 24 July 2008 08:45
ive just eased myself back into deadlifts after about 4 weeks off from them.... anyway i decided to go a little bit lighter to ease in:

i normally get
150kg x 3x6

i went for 140kg and managed 4 sets of 8, with slightly less rest and without wiping myself out as much

so now im wondering which is best for muscle growth,

method 1 = 2700kg total moved but placed the body under greater stress (cns strress too)
method 2 = 4480kg total moved with less stress on the body but shorter rest times and i generally felt better after it

both were in the correct rep range however some would say that the 150kg method may recruit more fast twitch fibres and many people say hard and heavy with compounds

others would say that method 2 led to greater work done in the correct rep range and placed less stress on recovery due to less cns stress

opinions please??
Dave284

  • Total Posts : 1024
  • Reward points : 731
  • Joined: 18/12/2007
  • Status: offline
RE: better for size??????? - 25 July 2008 23:29
Why not work up to one max effort set?

EG-

120kg x 6
140kg x 6
160kg x 6
42.5kg to go.
Funkyfresh

  • Total Posts : 613
  • Reward points : 1720
  • Joined: 17/07/2006
  • Status: offline
RE: better for size??????? - 27 July 2008 11:23

Why not work up to one max effort set?


:)

That's pretty much what I do for everything. I just change the rep scheme. Works pretty well and although it's not quite as taxing as doing straight sets with a set weight...e.g: 5x5 with 140kg - it is perfect for me as it keeps some energy in the tank for the rest of the workout, which allows me to maintain enough intensity and effort for every exercise I do.

Depends on your routine though I guess.

Sometimes I do a classic pyramid style - 10/8/6 or 12/10/8

Or do ramping sets where I work up to one maximum set, but keep the number of reps the same for every set which allows me to build up to a heavier weight - 120kg x 6/140kg x 6/160kg/6..etc.

Jake

  • Total Posts : 3498
  • Reward points : 869
  • Joined: 29/10/2007
  • Location: One of the five geographic themes.
  • Status: offline
RE: better for size??????? - 29 July 2008 19:54
Why not pyramid?

I believe deads and squats are well suited movements to a pyramid (or even reverse pyramid) rep scheme.
Nothing contributes so much to tranquilizing the mind as a steady purpose - a point on which the soul may fix its intellectual eye.
Jump to:
Current active users
There are 0 members and 1 guests.
Icon Legend and Permission
  • New Messages
  • No New Messages
  • Hot Topic w/ New Messages
  • Hot Topic w/o New Messages
  • Locked w/ New Messages
  • Locked w/o New Messages
  • Read Message
  • Post New Thread
  • Reply to message
  • Post New Poll
  • Submit Vote
  • Post reward post
  • Delete my own posts
  • Delete my own threads
  • Rate post
© 2000-2008 ASPPlayground.NET Forum Version 3.1.5
Go To Top Of Page