Visit the MuscleTalk Shop - and check out our own range of MuscleTalk branded supplements at great prices with FREE delivery!

mechabol v O Turinabol

Author
jaguar1
Senior Member
  • Total Posts : 169
  • Reward points: 6841
  • Joined: 2004/06/18 15:56:24
  • Location: portsmouth United Kingdom
  • Status: offline
2013/05/18 01:05:43 (permalink)

mechabol v O Turinabol

When weighing up the benefits to risk ratio which is the better product to use - thanks
#1

10 Replies Related Threads

    Snugg
    Olympian Member
    • Total Posts : 625
    • Reward points: 1581
    • Joined: 2012/02/28 11:09:45
    • Status: offline
    Re:mechabol v O Turinabol 2013/05/18 02:23:05 (permalink)
    If I was comparing a pro-hormone to oral turinabol i'd weigh it up between turinabol and halodrol as they are very similar I think.
     
    As far as safety goes that's a hard one. Real AAS have been around for donkeys years, practically every steroid was developed in the 50's and 60's and there's been virtually no new genuine AAS invented recently. This means that it's much easier to look at the safety risks for AAS as they have been tried and tested. Most of the pro-hormones have just popped up in recent years so some of the risks may not be known yet.
     
    Anyway both oral turinabol, mechabol and halodrol are considered pretty safe with a low risk of sides. I've used them all and had great experiences with them. Actual turinabol and anavar are my two favourite orals ever made so are hard to beat. Saying that though Halodrol and pro-mag are not too far off from being as good.
     
    If you have a trusted source you can get proper turinabol from i'd personally go for that, as long as the cost was reasonable. If your not entirely sure if you will get a good UGL turinabol then go for the mechabol as at least you can be sure you will get the real thing when you buy a pro-hormone from one of the rated pro-hormone suppliers.
     
    #2
    lost
    Pro-Member
    • Total Posts : 5936
    • Reward points: 7772
    • Joined: 2006/05/27 12:10:41
    • Location: London
    • Status: offline
    Re:mechabol v O Turinabol 2013/05/18 21:06:56 (permalink)
    bang for buck hdrol,mechabol or pmag would probably be better than tbol, in the end it comes down to price which we can't really discuss and how much you trust your source

     
    free bitcoins,dogecoin,litecoins daily no catch
     
    https://qoinpro.com/e7aceec5b83f103ef8ef1684ab5c8886
    #3
    BICEP_BILL
    Pro-Member
    • Total Posts : 3333
    • Reward points: 3708
    • Joined: 2010/09/02 22:06:15
    • Location: Ireland
    • Status: offline
    Re:mechabol v O Turinabol 2013/05/18 23:19:04 (permalink)
    All the "new" pro hormones are actually very very old aas that were knocked on the head due to toxicity issues.


       
       
    #4
    Snugg
    Olympian Member
    • Total Posts : 625
    • Reward points: 1581
    • Joined: 2012/02/28 11:09:45
    • Status: offline
    Re:mechabol v O Turinabol 2013/05/21 18:56:59 (permalink)
    BICEP_BILL

    All the "new" pro hormones are actually very very old aas that were knocked on the head due to toxicity issues.

     
    Your scaring me now, is this really true?
    #5
    BICEP_BILL
    Pro-Member
    • Total Posts : 3333
    • Reward points: 3708
    • Joined: 2010/09/02 22:06:15
    • Location: Ireland
    • Status: offline
    Re:mechabol v O Turinabol 2013/05/21 20:33:03 (permalink)
    Go to Henryv's blog and look at thd year each drug was synthesised, Wikipedia them also as a lot of them will now have data entered

    The are all old aas being reborn and sold OTC

    All or most were trialed in medical scenarios and all of them were seen to be too toxic or have too many side effects to be included in mainstream medicine.



       
       
    #6
    BICEP_BILL
    Pro-Member
    • Total Posts : 3333
    • Reward points: 3708
    • Joined: 2010/09/02 22:06:15
    • Location: Ireland
    • Status: offline
    Re:mechabol v O Turinabol 2013/05/21 20:37:06 (permalink)
    Here's an example. Superdrol.

    The synthesis of methasterone is first mentioned in the literature in 1956
    This initial mention is elaborated upon in a 1959 research journal article, where its method of synthesis is discussed in greater detail, its tumor inhibiting properties are verified, and it is noted as being a “potent orally active anabolic agent exhibiting only weak androgenic activity.

    Methasterone (Superdrol, methasteron, and methyldrostanolone) is an oral anabolic steroid that was never marketed through legitimate channels for medicinal purposes. It was brought to market, instead, in a clandestine fashion as a “designer steroid.”

    Methasterone resurfaced in 2005 as a “designer steroid”.[5] It was brought to market by Designer Supplements as the primary ingredient of a dietary supplement named Superdrol

       
       
    #7
    BICEP_BILL
    Pro-Member
    • Total Posts : 3333
    • Reward points: 3708
    • Joined: 2010/09/02 22:06:15
    • Location: Ireland
    • Status: offline
    Re:mechabol v O Turinabol 2013/05/21 20:53:53 (permalink)
    P-Plex was around in 1960's



    Nomenclature: 17a-methyl 5a-androst-2-ene-17b-ol or 17a-methyl-etioallocholan-2-ene-17b-ol

    Synonyms: Desoxymethyltestosterone, Madol, Phera-Plex, P-Plex

    This long-forgotten steroid, patented in the 1960s but never commercialised legitimately, was rediscovered and distributed to athletes as part of the BALCO scandal. Structurally it is a 17a-methylated version of a naturally occurring pheromone (naturally occurring in elephants, that is), which is where it gets its name.



    Will try to post a journal/article I read which explained the toxicity issues with all these OTC drugs.

    I'm sure someone else will chime in though


       
       
    #8
    simonboyle
    Pro-Member
    • Total Posts : 2646
    • Reward points: 1325
    • Joined: 2013/03/07 20:08:19
    • Location: GLASGOW, UK.
    • Status: offline
    Re:mechabol v O Turinabol 2013/05/21 23:37:41 (permalink)
    yeah, most are old, very few new ones as the 60s were booming for steroid research. As to the toxicity issues they were not all binned because of toxicity issues, a lot were, but not all, and the toxicity was for the therapeutic dose, which is irrelevant for these discussions as all oral AAS are toxic as hell when used in the doses we use them at. Certain ones are more liver toxic, like superdrol, but again this is slightly over played and very manageable.
     
    And I thought mechabol was methyl-clostebol, not a ph, and that Hdrol converts to oral Turanibol?  
    #9
    henryv
    Pro-Member
    • Total Posts : 1018
    • Reward points: 5560
    • Joined: 2008/08/08 19:20:29
    • Status: offline
    Re:mechabol v O Turinabol 2013/05/22 09:13:19 (permalink)
    BICEP_BILL All the "new" pro hormones are actually very very old aas that were knocked on the head due to toxicity issues.

    The first bit of that sentence is true. Most of the ones on the market now were never used in humans in the 60s. They tested a lot of steroids on rats. There were relatively few drug companies, and they tested a lot of different compounds. Each company only needed one or two anabolic steroids to sell (competing against themselves wouldn't have made good business sense),  so inevitably they pursued only the most attractive options and discarded the rest (after patenting the process used to make them so nobody else could sell them).

    Total Flex Blog
    #10
    BICEP_BILL
    Pro-Member
    • Total Posts : 3333
    • Reward points: 3708
    • Joined: 2010/09/02 22:06:15
    • Location: Ireland
    • Status: offline
    Re:mechabol v O Turinabol 2013/05/22 10:03:07 (permalink)
    Cool cheers for that info.

       
       
    #11
    Jump to:
    MuscleTalk Shop - Bodybuilding Supplements
    ©2014 All content is copyright of MuscleTalk.co.uk and its use elsewhere is prohibited. (posting guidelines | privacy | advertise | contact us | supported by)
    © 2014 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.0