omega 3 fish oil capsules

Stu, what part of "1 in 3 people are at a high risk of CHD on a high-carb, low-fat diet" did you not understand? This has nothing to do with bodybuilding, or me. It's genetics.

You say that I have not learned anything. Pot, kettle, black comes to mind. May I respectfully suggest that you come back when you have some more experience of how the human body works.

Stu, this book is a little old (1999) but worth a read as it has detailed info on the type of lipoproteins.

The Heart Disease Breakthrough by Thomas Yannios

James Collier
MT Co-Owner & Nutrition Consultant

1 in 3 people are at a high risk of CHD on a high-carb, low-fat diet

My first reaction to your statement is bo**ocks.

This is just not true, however the fish oil merchants want to spin it.

The overwhelming evidence is that people who eat a low fat high starchy carb diet live longer than any other population group.

stuart hamilton
Hamiltons Fitness
Colchester, UK
www.HamiltonsFitness.co.uk
www.HamiltonsHealth.com

There is a study by Darlene Dreon et al. See The disastrous results of a low-fat diet and read the comments section, where I posted a link to it requesting further information from Dr Davis.

EDIT: "The regression predicts that with a diet with 10% of energy as fat, approximately two-thirds of men would express phenotype B." Thats even worse than I previously thought.

Let's see your overwhelming evidence then. I hope it's not epidemiological data.

James


Stu, this book is a little old (1999) but worth a read as it has detailed info on the type of lipoproteins.

The Heart Disease Breakthrough by Thomas Yannios

And a very good book it is too :)

Stop trying to score points off each other here - neither of you is going to be swayed by the other - so what is the point of this tete-a-tete?

Les Willis
Nutrition Consultant
Healthy Action

I used to think I knew what busy was - now I am too busy to think about it!

I'm trying to make the point that:

a) Omega-3 supplementation is beneficial to many people.
b) A high-carb, low-fat diet is not suitable for everyone.

Studies have been done to show the supplementing cod liver oil or flax into a diet can actually reduce body fat and improve strength, Arnie also used to reccomend this. Theres alot of research on it on the web.
 
I take 5 a day place 2 flax seed oil and have found this causes no ill effect what so ever.  Also, whilst you shouldnt be eating bad fats good fats are essential to  a healthy diet even on a cutting cycle.  (but should be kept low)

Yawn, i'm off to have a life.

stuart hamilton
Hamiltons Fitness
Colchester, UK
www.HamiltonsFitness.co.uk
www.HamiltonsHealth.com

Hi Stuart
 
On an unrelated subject, but one a guy of your experience has probably got a knowledge of, can you help me out please, got a post here.  On a cdk diet, had food poisoning and just not sure how to continue with the plan, your thoughts would be appreciated
 
http://www.muscletalk.co.uk/CDK-DIET-had-food-poisoning-what-do-i-do-m3682733.aspx
 
thanks
Dan

Oh, what a surprise! I ask Stu to provide some overwhelming evidence to support his opinion and I get....

Stuart - Nige doesn't have to be a bodybuilder to be informed, to imply as such is plain daft.

There are scores of nutritionists out there who themselves do not compete (not saying Nige is one BTW). Does this make their knowledge invalid?

I've mainly stayed out of this because I can't be arsed with the constant tirade of nonsense that you put forward as fact, then categorically fail to bother backing up.

I truly hope you are lucky enough to be on the right side of the bell curve for your way of thinking, as despite the fact that your dietary advice grates my ass big time, dying young doesn't seem to be a nice thing to wish on anyone.

As I've stated in the past I do respect what you have achieved with your physique big time, however your long term views on relevant topics appear overtly blinkered and plain hazardous, particularly when you pass them on as advice.

Savant | Udos Choice | 2010 Shape up

Hi Tony. It's good to be back to my old (sarky?) self!

Stu's argument from authority (I have big muscles and low bodyfat therefore I must know what I'm talking about) is becoming tedious. I don't think that I'm being unreasonable in asking for him to provide some decent (non-epidemiological) evidence to back up his opinion. I wonder if we'll ever get any?

Tony Barnes


A deficiency in medical terms is when you have so little of a nutrient in your diet that you have a specific negative medical effect.

and for Omega 3 the observed clinical symptoms are hemorhragic dermatitis, hemorrhagic folliculitis, scaly dermtitis and skin atrophy. of which you'll have a hard time finding evidence evidence for a deficiency in a fraction of any population let alone most Brits

My point was in support of Les as he made a valid point - as a population our oily fish intake isn't exactly great. If your is worse then it's likely that you could do well to increase it.

x popultation does more exercise. y population eats avacoda. z population drinks a glass of wine with their meals...

Stuart - the point is as per my first paragraph. Deficiency as a definition ignores levels where you thrive. If you go about life just staying away from being deficient in all your nutrients, you aren't going to have a great life. It leaves no margin for error, and no option for additional benefits.

but we have no idea what levels are optimal

life is one massive risk, of which w3s are not the greatest. it could be more DHA. or it could be not too much. or it could be more seed oils. it's not a bad idea to have your bases covered. but we just don't know yet, either way.

-

The overwhelming evidence is that people who eat a low fat high starchy carb diet live longer than any other population group.

really?

-

lol, yes, good to see you back Nige!

but we have no idea what levels are optimal 

From a couple of decades of trial and error, 15ml per 25kg bodyweight of Udos is an amount where most people get the best response, so this is a marker for an optimal intake.


I'm first to admit this needs money throwing at it for decent research, the issues are where to start; what benefit will come out of it (i.e. could we even use the results?); etc. There is some sports related stuff coming down the line which should hopefully answer some people's questions, but I can guarantee that no matter what the results, nor what the methods, there will always be a "but you didn't do x, and you never covered y" - etc. That level of detail comes from huge levels of research - which is typically reserved for things you can patent.


That does leave us with a bundle of observational stuff, which you can obviously take however you like.

Savant | Udos Choice | 2010 Shape up