Froch V Dirrell. The start of the 'Super six tourney'

Re:Froch V Dirrell. The start of the 'Super six tourney' (Neb)

Sun, 27 Dec 2009 18:44:32 GMT

nice double Neb

Re:Froch V Dirrell. The start of the 'Super six tourney' (Neb)

Sun, 27 Dec 2009 18:44:05 GMT

LOL

Re:Froch V Dirrell. The start of the 'Super six tourney' (Neb)

Sun, 27 Dec 2009 18:44:03 GMT

LOL

Re:Froch V Dirrell. The start of the 'Super six tourney' (Trident)

Sun, 27 Dec 2009 18:42:50 GMT

Hows it going Integra?? LMAO.

Re:Froch V Dirrell. The start of the 'Super six tourney' (Boredatwork)

Sun, 27 Dec 2009 18:15:58 GMT

Ah, the bitterness is overwhelming....

Re:Froch V Dirrell. The start of the 'Super six tourney' (Trident)

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:59:43 GMT

Trident

Integra

Trident

Integra

Robbery? Some people are just retarded. A close fight, could have gone either way. But a robbery? LOL!

Now now, no need to be bitter.. LMAO!

Yep. exactly what I was saying. No need to be bitter Trident, its nobodies fault other than Dirrells that he lost.

Robbery indeed, lol! Of course you didnt bet, the benefit of hindsight is such a fantastic thing.....pmsl

Mid rounds indeed....

'Retarded' LMAO... I shall enjoy your wit untill you get yourself banned again, which will happen.

I enjoyed your wit.

Re:Froch V Dirrell. The start of the 'Super six tourney' (Rasputin)

Sun, 25 Oct 2009 10:08:27 GMT

Fair enough i was thinking if that dirrell bloke had properly connected with a big one could have gone down.

Re:Froch V Dirrell. The start of the 'Super six tourney' (Neb)

Sun, 25 Oct 2009 09:23:39 GMT

are they normally like this

Yes....tbf, he can take a punch, he has also been put on his arse but I really can't see him holding onto that belt for much longer

Re:Froch V Dirrell. The start of the 'Super six tourney' (Rasputin)

Sun, 25 Oct 2009 09:11:40 GMT

I watched this fight last night from the 7th onwards thought froch was lucky tbh but would be intrested to see the whole fight. Frochs hands were soo low towards the end of the fight are they normally like this because it wont be long before he gets ktfo !!

Re:Froch V Dirrell. The start of the 'Super six tourney' (Integra)

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:20:43 GMT

Integra

Here we go again clutching at straws with hastily edited words to paper over the cracks.

Re:Froch V Dirrell. The start of the 'Super six tourney' (Trident)

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:59:07 GMT

steve124149

Trident

Integra

5.

Speaks volumes realy.

There is no evidence of my 'mouth running way with myself' on his thread.

"Some people are just retarded".... Typical comments to cause unrest in a thread. Even after 4 bans for similar stuff you dont seem to change.

Simple fact is that you incorrectly called the winner, incorrectly called the 'value bets', claimed a 'robbery' - despite it being nothing more than a closely fought SD which happens every weekend - yet can not see the irony in your own remarks in the aftermath. Nothing more, nothing less.

Your right. What you did do was manage to predict the 1/3 odds on Fav to win, which he did, but only just.

I did indeed name 'value bets' which as you should know are bets which are priced higher than they should be and offer value. Your prediction of a Froch stoppage was actually what those bets were!

TBH virtualy every prediction you make on here is simply that the favourite will win the fight. Its that simple. The method you pick is mostly the one thats the most probable and that the majority agree on in internet land. Should they lose then its one of those things, but should they win, which odds on Favs mostly do! then this thread gives a classis example of your cockyness and attitude, IE the 'Retarded' comments.

As for mocking myself for actually picking fighters who are not favourites and mocking my lack of success, well all I can say is that ive probably started 15 to 20 threads on here over the last 7 to 8 years (mostly in general) stateing I think a strong outsider or even extreme outsider will win a fight. I would say that probably 10 of those threads have been correctly predicted. I will do a search but fear some will have been lost in forum cleanups.The long standing members here will remember them Im sure. Tim Bradley at 6/1, Sexton 7/2. Stateing that Prescot was being tipped in the betting circles for a 10/1 win only hours before the fight. Tipping Harrison to get beat by Williams at 10/1.

Im happy to stick my neck out on the tough to calls ones such as Witter v Alexander, which you sat on the fence for. Even money fight when I called It correctly.

I'm manager of a Ladbrokes and I'll say that approximetly half of odds on favourites lose in racing and about a third in football.

He did pick the odds on favourite, saying it was a likely thing to happen- and he was right. Who cares what the betting market says- it's made up from what experts think and the money on the different outcomes.

He wasn't saying "I've got a tip for you" he was saying "I think x will happen" which it did.

As for value bets, it's pointless saying 7/1 for conduit is good value when you yourself believe that sea the stars is going to win.

Don't get me wrong you have made several correct predictions despite the betting market being against you, and it's quite impressive when you take into account long odds on a two horse race.

In boxing i would say 7/10 odds on Favs win. Short odds on favs which Integra often picks win in probably 8/10 cases. I would be amazed if he could name an outsider who hes picked thats been over 6/4, let alone 6/1.

My point being that constant fav backing in boxing is a very easy thing to do and requires no skill what so ever, your simply just running with the odds and what the majority say. A 1/3 win on an SD is a skin of the teeth thing.

Junior witter was an 1/8 Fav when when I started a thread saying he would get beat by the 6/1 bradley. When he lost there was no sign of me taking the pis* out of Integra nor anyone else who disagreed with me on any matter.

Thats realy the crux of this thread now. Its not realy about who picks which fighter or who wins but more about respecting other peoples views. Integra lacks this quaility and thus has been banned 4 times from the forum, which does speak volumes.

Dirrell winning on points was a very near miss with the SD. Yes Froch won in a close fight, but the mid round stoppage was indeed way off the mark, thus the a limp home 1/3 is hardly the grounds to start calling people retards.

Cheers, Rich

Re:Froch V Dirrell. The start of the 'Super six tourney' (steve124149)

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:27:04 GMT

Trident

Integra

5.

Speaks volumes realy.

There is no evidence of my 'mouth running way with myself' on his thread.

"Some people are just retarded".... Typical comments to cause unrest in a thread. Even after 4 bans for similar stuff you dont seem to change.

Simple fact is that you incorrectly called the winner, incorrectly called the 'value bets', claimed a 'robbery' - despite it being nothing more than a closely fought SD which happens every weekend - yet can not see the irony in your own remarks in the aftermath. Nothing more, nothing less.

Your right. What you did do was manage to predict the 1/3 odds on Fav to win, which he did, but only just.

I did indeed name 'value bets' which as you should know are bets which are priced higher than they should be and offer value. Your prediction of a Froch stoppage was actually what those bets were!

TBH virtualy every prediction you make on here is simply that the favourite will win the fight. Its that simple. The method you pick is mostly the one thats the most probable and that the majority agree on in internet land. Should they lose then its one of those things, but should they win, which odds on Favs mostly do! then this thread gives a classis example of your cockyness and attitude, IE the 'Retarded' comments.

As for mocking myself for actually picking fighters who are not favourites and mocking my lack of success, well all I can say is that ive probably started 15 to 20 threads on here over the last 7 to 8 years (mostly in general) stateing I think a strong outsider or even extreme outsider will win a fight. I would say that probably 10 of those threads have been correctly predicted. I will do a search but fear some will have been lost in forum cleanups.The long standing members here will remember them Im sure. Tim Bradley at 6/1, Sexton 7/2. Stateing that Prescot was being tipped in the betting circles for a 10/1 win only hours before the fight. Tipping Harrison to get beat by Williams at 10/1.

Im happy to stick my neck out on the tough to calls ones such as Witter v Alexander, which you sat on the fence for. Even money fight when I called It correctly.

I'm manager of a Ladbrokes and I'll say that approximetly half of odds on favourites lose in racing and about a third in football.

He did pick the odds on favourite, saying it was a likely thing to happen- and he was right. Who cares what the betting market says- it's made up from what experts think and the money on the different outcomes.

He wasn't saying "I've got a tip for you" he was saying "I think x will happen" which it did.

As for value bets, it's pointless saying 7/1 for conduit is good value when you yourself believe that sea the stars is going to win.

Don't get me wrong you have made several correct predictions despite the betting market being against you, and it's quite impressive when you take into account long odds on a two horse race.

Re:Froch V Dirrell. The start of the 'Super six tourney' (Integra)

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:41:23 GMT

Here we go again clutching at straws with hastily edited words to paper over the cracks.

Re:Froch V Dirrell. The start of the 'Super six tourney' (Trident)

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:44:09 GMT

Integra

5.

Speaks volumes realy.

There is no evidence of my 'mouth running way with myself' on his thread.

"Some people are just retarded".... Typical comments to cause unrest in a thread. Even after 4 bans for similar stuff you dont seem to change.

Simple fact is that you incorrectly called the winner, incorrectly called the 'value bets', claimed a 'robbery' - despite it being nothing more than a closely fought SD which happens every weekend - yet can not see the irony in your own remarks in the aftermath. Nothing more, nothing less.

Your right. What you did do was manage to predict the 1/3 odds on Fav to win, which he did, but only just.

I did indeed name 'value bets' which as you should know are bets which are priced higher than they should be and offer value. Your prediction of a Froch stoppage was actually what those bets were!

TBH virtualy every prediction you make on here is simply that the favourite will win the fight. Its that simple. The method you pick is mostly the one thats the most probable and that the majority agree on in internet land. Should they lose then its one of those things, but should they win, which odds on Favs mostly do! then this thread gives a classis example of your cockyness and attitude, IE the 'Retarded' comments.

As for mocking myself for actually picking fighters who are not favourites and mocking my lack of success, well all I can say is that ive probably started 15 to 20 threads on here over the last 7 to 8 years (mostly in general) stateing I think a strong outsider or even extreme outsider will win a fight. I would say that probably 10 of those threads have been correctly predicted. I will do a search but fear some will have been lost in forum cleanups.The long standing members here will remember them Im sure. Tim Bradley at 6/1, Sexton 7/2. Stateing that Prescot was being tipped in the betting circles for a 10/1 win only hours before the fight. Tipping Harrison to get beat by Williams at 10/1.

Im happy to stick my neck out on the tough to calls ones such as Witter v Alexander, which you sat on the fence for. Even money fight when I called It correctly.

Re:Froch V Dirrell. The start of the 'Super six tourney' (steve124149)

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:24:55 GMT

Integra

5.

There is no evidence of my 'mouth running way with myself' on his thread.

Simple fact is that you incorrectly called the winner, incorrectly called the 'value bets', claimed a 'robbery' - despite it being nothing more than a closely fought SD which happens every weekend - yet can not see the irony in your own remarks in the aftermath. Nothing more, nothing less.

The man has a point

Re:Froch V Dirrell. The start of the 'Super six tourney' (Integra)

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:27:49 GMT

5.

There is no evidence of my 'mouth running way with myself' on his thread.

Simple fact is that you incorrectly called the winner, incorrectly called the 'value bets', claimed a 'robbery' - despite it being nothing more than a closely fought SD which happens every weekend - yet can not see the irony in your own remarks in the aftermath. Nothing more, nothing less.

Re:Froch V Dirrell. The start of the 'Super six tourney' (Trident)

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:42:24 GMT

Integra

Trident

Integra

Trident

Integra

Robbery? Some people are just retarded. A close fight, could have gone either way. But a robbery? LOL!

Now now, no need to be bitter.. LMAO!

Yep. exactly what I was saying. No need to be bitter Trident, its nobodies fault other than Dirrells that he lost.

Robbery indeed, lol! Of course you didnt bet, the benefit of hindsight is such a fantastic thing.....pmsl

Mid rounds indeed....

'Retarded' LMAO... I shall enjoy your wit untill you get yourself banned again, which will happen.

No wit. You picked the wrong guy, and your other 'value bets' didnt quite come off buddy. No shame in that. might aswell keep trying and trying until the outsider eventually comes up trumps.

The only robbery here was the bookies pocketing your 'value' bets. To suggest Dirrell did enough in that fight to claim a robbery is not quite retarded but definitely borderline.

As I say , It wont be long before your banned again. Why? simply because you cannot stop your mouth running way with yourself from behind your keyboard.

What will that make it? 4 bans?

Re:Froch V Dirrell. The start of the 'Super six tourney' (speydream)

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:50:26 GMT

Integra

speydream

Poor taylor is all i can say, the man can barley talk properly now....

Evidence that Steele was correct to stop the fight.

No, thats from years of brawling, not simply because of the chavez fight.

Those last few seconds would not have made a difference and you know it.

Re:Froch V Dirrell. The start of the 'Super six tourney' (Integra)

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:44:07 GMT

speydream

Poor taylor is all i can say, the man can barley talk properly now....

Evidence that Steele was correct to stop the fight.

Re:Froch V Dirrell. The start of the 'Super six tourney' (speydream)

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:40:48 GMT

kinglean

The concensus in repsect to the JCChavez v Meldrick Taylor fight is that JCC was a very fortunate man indeed.

For what its worth i agree with Steeles stoppage of the JCC Taylor fight. If you cant defend yourself then the ref should step in, regardless of how long is left.

Steeles was taking back handers from don king the ****. He should never have stopped that chavez fight, taylor took hard punches for every round of that fight. With only a few seconds left, steeles knew this was his last chance to steal the fight for don king and he did it. Poor taylor is all i can say, the man can barley talk properly now....