long term test levels

Re:long term test levels (1ManRiot)

Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:50:18 GMT

^ correct

Seems that way, but there is little to no research to prove either way

Re:long term test levels (Entrophy)

Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:34:42 GMT

so that would suggest moderate cycles dont tend to have any real impact on a persons natural test levels in the longer term.?

Re:long term test levels (ThaiFighter)

Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:36:36 GMT

Aren't there studies showing that...sans PCT, test levels after moderate cycles of X/Y/Z tend to go back to "normal" for that individual after 1-4months?

I'm sure I've that that in Llewellyn's book or somewhere...

Re:long term test levels (Celt)

Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:36:04 GMT

Nice post by Thai above - its a wider question when you're asking about your test levels in a year

What I would suggest is likely though, is that imo your test levels will be the same in a year's time whether you run that cycle or not

Again, thats my opinion only rather than scientific fact

Re:long term test levels (ThaiFighter)

Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:13:56 GMT

No one will have any idea - going on cycle IS a risk and you cannot have a risk free cycle.

You have to weigh the risks up and see if it's worth it to you :)

Imo, low-moderate doses of AAS are probably pretty safe for adult men, if you take adaquate precautions, have a healthy diet, training schedule, and take long time off between cycles...but that's purely personal opinion.

In terms of testosterone recovery, after 25yrs old your natural test levels start to slide...so what you'll make at 27yrs old should be less than 25 and so on...so they're on a slide anyways tbh.

Hence all the 40yr+ men in the US going on HRT lol.

long term test levels (Entrophy)

Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:08:40 GMT

would a moderate cycle. eg. HDrol or 6 weeks and proper PCT. e.g. Nolva standard protocol, have any real affect on your nat test levels in a years time than if you had not taken it?