Sponsored by: Medichecks is the stress free, speedy way to get a comprehensive, accurate insight into your health. Our tests include Sports Hormone checks, testosterone, iron status, cholesterol and more.

Front load vs kickstart?

Author
cruiserweight
New Member
  • Total Posts : 46
  • Reward points: 8937
  • Joined: 2006/06/01 23:13:47
  • Location: Birmingham
  • Status: offline
2006/07/12 13:05:59 (permalink)

Front load vs kickstart?

was just wonderin what people thought were the pros and cons of a frontload vs an oral kickstart.....lets say with a long ester in a bulking cycle.
#1

6 Replies Related Threads

    Valley Fitness
    JohnOvManchester
    Pro-Member
    • Total Posts : 13488
    • Reward points: 10748
    • Joined: 2003/03/31 01:17:14
    • Location: Manchester, UK
    • Status: offline
    RE: Front load vs kickstart? 2006/07/12 16:08:29 (permalink)
    Oral kickstart 100% better

    #2
    cranny
    Olympian Member
    • Total Posts : 673
    • Reward points: 4453
    • Joined: 2005/02/03 15:24:06
    • Status: offline
    RE: Front load vs kickstart? 2006/07/12 16:17:37 (permalink)
    Agree, kickstart it. I tried frontloading before and noticed no dif.
    #3
    cruiserweight
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 46
    • Reward points: 8937
    • Joined: 2006/06/01 23:13:47
    • Location: Birmingham
    • Status: offline
    RE: Front load vs kickstart? 2006/07/14 20:47:25 (permalink)
    bump
    #4
    stone14
    Pro-Member
    • Total Posts : 9642
    • Reward points: 9639
    • Joined: 2006/01/15 15:02:44
    • Location: north east uk
    • Status: offline
    RE: Front load vs kickstart? 2006/07/14 20:50:19 (permalink)
    oral kickstart imo is better than a front load, unless your front loading with something like test prop 100mg ed till your longer esters kick in.

    i believe with a healthy active lifestyle and some good knowledge and aas/peps use etc that you can live a longer stronger better life.

    main interests: physique conditioning, bbj, muay thai.
    #5
    Ecto man
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 72
    • Reward points: 6072
    • Joined: 2003/08/02 11:49:57
    • Location: Sussex United Kingdom
    • Status: offline
    RE: Front load vs kickstart? 2006/07/15 10:11:16 (permalink)


    #6
    CoVetous
    Pro-Member
    • Total Posts : 1170
    • Reward points: 2844
    • Joined: 2004/09/25 02:16:05
    • Location: USA (Houston, Texas)
    • Status: offline
    RE: Front load vs kickstart? 2006/07/15 21:39:30 (permalink)
    oral is better for me too.
    #7
    Jump to:
    ©2017 All content is copyright of MuscleTalk.co.uk and its use elsewhere is prohibited. (posting guidelines | privacy | advertise | contact us | supported by)
    © 2017 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.5