YB
BannerBanner

Helpful ReplySARM's

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Author
Half full
Universe Member
  • Total Posts : 253
  • Reward points: 5163
  • Joined: 2010/11/21 09:41:40
  • Status: offline
2015/02/23 20:14:45 (permalink)
0

SARM's

Another week, another SARM. Seems these are massively growing in popularity!
 
Quad Stack by Invitro Labs
 
Serving Size: 1 Capsule
Servings per Container: 60 Capsules
 
Amount per Serving
LGD-4033 - 15mg*
S4 - 25mg*
GW-501516 - 10mg*
androsta-3 5-diene-7 17-dione - 25mg*
Stinging Nettle - 450mg*
N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine - 50mg*
Milk Thistle - 75mg*
 
That's some pretty potent SARM! Anybody think these could end up being as popular as PH's?
#1
Prohormones
uubiduu
Olympian Member
  • Total Posts : 458
  • Reward points: 4466
  • Joined: 2011/04/19 17:00:59
  • Status: offline
Re: 2015/02/23 20:30:10 (permalink)☄ Helpfulby simonboyle 2015/02/24 13:45:15
0
Wouldnt take that even if something gives me one Million pounds due to the GW content
#2
KS_Manchester
Pro-Member
  • Total Posts : 3472
  • Reward points: 5106
  • Joined: 2010/05/16 22:09:48
  • Status: offline
Re: 2015/02/23 20:59:54 (permalink)☄ Helpfulby simonboyle 2015/02/24 13:45:19
0
...and the S4

K
#3
uubiduu
Olympian Member
  • Total Posts : 458
  • Reward points: 4466
  • Joined: 2011/04/19 17:00:59
  • Status: offline
Re: 2015/02/24 06:44:06 (permalink)
0
Yes too many risks involved with these two.Would prefer a high dosed lgd solo product which is purity tested
#4
gbaldy
Senior Member
  • Total Posts : 104
  • Reward points: 5474
  • Joined: 2011/03/03 11:14:35
  • Status: offline
Re: 2015/02/24 12:18:56 (permalink)
0
what are S4 and GW ??
#5
simonboyle
Pro-Member
  • Total Posts : 8783
  • Reward points: 4136
  • Joined: 2013/03/07 20:08:19
  • Status: offline
Re: 2015/02/24 13:45:57 (permalink)
0
gbaldy
what are S4 and GW ??


google them, they are SARMs. vision issues and cancer are the main worrying sides.
#6
sam397cars
New Member
  • Total Posts : 47
  • Reward points: 6206
  • Joined: 2007/01/15 20:44:40
  • Status: offline
Re: 2015/02/24 18:45:26 (permalink)
0
How many of these 'servings' would I take each day?
#7
KS_Manchester
Pro-Member
  • Total Posts : 3472
  • Reward points: 5106
  • Joined: 2010/05/16 22:09:48
  • Status: offline
Re: 2015/02/24 18:53:06 (permalink)
0
None. Bin it.
#8
Half full
Universe Member
  • Total Posts : 253
  • Reward points: 5163
  • Joined: 2010/11/21 09:41:40
  • Status: offline
Re: 2015/02/24 20:47:59 (permalink)
0
simonboyle
gbaldy
what are S4 and GW ??


google them, they are SARMs. vision issues and cancer are the main worrying sides.


I've heard of the 'vision' issues with S4. Are the 'cancer' issues related to S4, GW, or all SARMS?
#9
Uriel
Pro-Member
  • Total Posts : 5051
  • Reward points: 4403
  • Joined: 2013/01/20 20:48:48
  • Status: offline
Re: 2015/02/24 21:01:44 (permalink)☄ Helpfulby simonboyle 2015/02/25 01:29:38
0
Ah, the old "more is better" approach. American company I take it?
 
The logic behind such a product is simply amazing:
Drug 1 comes out, makes people blind, pharmaceutical companies drop it and start working on drug 2.
Drug 2 comes out, gives people cancer, pharmaceutical companies drop it and start working on drug 3.
Drug 3 comes out, has low side effects and makes the previous ones obsolete, people think "I know, I'll take all 3!" 
 
And of course throw in the usual test booster placebos just for kicks.
post edited by Uriel - 2015/02/24 21:03:08
#10
simonboyle
Pro-Member
  • Total Posts : 8783
  • Reward points: 4136
  • Joined: 2013/03/07 20:08:19
  • Status: offline
Re: 2015/02/25 01:30:48 (permalink)
0
SARMs are no joke, there is plenty of info out there. Google each one and read up.
#11
Half full
Universe Member
  • Total Posts : 253
  • Reward points: 5163
  • Joined: 2010/11/21 09:41:40
  • Status: offline
Re: 2015/02/25 08:34:58 (permalink)
0
simonboyle
SARMs are no joke, there is plenty of info out there. Google each one and read up.


I read about GW and it's link to cancer last night. Worrying. Is Osta the safest SARM?
#12
simonboyle
Pro-Member
  • Total Posts : 8783
  • Reward points: 4136
  • Joined: 2013/03/07 20:08:19
  • Status: offline
Re: 2015/02/25 14:39:43 (permalink)
0
Probably.
Lgd has a great safety profile too.
#13
Half full
Universe Member
  • Total Posts : 253
  • Reward points: 5163
  • Joined: 2010/11/21 09:41:40
  • Status: offline
Re: 2015/02/25 15:10:59 (permalink)
0
Cheers Si
#14
Ksparx
New Member
  • Total Posts : 24
  • Reward points: 2480
  • Joined: 2012/01/02 13:44:51
  • Status: offline
Re: 2015/02/26 21:31:51 (permalink)
0
Read that the issue with GW and cancer was that in the research they fed the rats a very high dose for a very long period (10 times of a "normal" dose). So common sense tells me that this would make sense, if it's actually the case, cause high dose of any kind of drug would be bad for you.
 
GW seems very popular in the US.
#15
bakermanus
New Member
  • Total Posts : 41
  • Reward points: 581
  • Joined: 2015/02/07 19:04:26
  • Status: offline
Re: 2015/02/27 08:23:52 (permalink)☄ Helpfulby simonboyle 2015/02/27 10:05:57
0
Ksparx
Read that the issue with GW and cancer was that in the research they fed the rats a very high dose for a very long period (10 times of a "normal" dose). So common sense tells me that this would make sense, if it's actually the case, cause high dose of any kind of drug would be bad for you.
 
GW seems very popular in the US.




 
That's what Dylan fuc**** Gemely says. He promotes sarms1 which is the biggest supplier in the US.  If it was safe, the company would not have dropped the development that they have spent millions of $$$.  Here is a quote from Wiki.
 
 
A 2004 article in The Wall Street Journal noted that a study published in Nature Medicine had found that GW501516 increased polyps in specially-bred mice,[3][31] but GSK said that they had not identified any safety problems with the compound and would continue to develop it.[14] Researchers from GSK presented findings of the effects of giving GW501516 to rats and mice for two years at the 2009 meeting of the Society of Toxicology. The compound was found to significantly increase the chances of developing cancer and development of the drug was subsequently halted.[32][33][34]
In 2013 New Scientist reported that "tests on rats showed that at all doses, the drug rapidly causes cancers in a multitude of organs, including the liver, bladder, stomach, skin, thyroid, tongue, testes, ovaries and womb."[4] In 2013 WADA took the rare step of warning potential users of the compound of the possible health risks. They stated "clinical approval has not, and will not be given for this substance".[2][24]
 
tests on rats showed that at all doses, the drug rapidly causes cancers
 
at all doses
 
i haven't  found any article that would have confirmed what Gemely claims. 
Stay away from that **** 
 
post edited by bakermanus - 2015/02/27 08:54:18
#16
Ksparx
New Member
  • Total Posts : 24
  • Reward points: 2480
  • Joined: 2012/01/02 13:44:51
  • Status: offline
Re: 2015/02/27 08:43:51 (permalink)
0
Okay, so any dose can cause cancer. But the rats and mice was given GW for 2 years straight?
#17
bakermanus
New Member
  • Total Posts : 41
  • Reward points: 581
  • Joined: 2015/02/07 19:04:26
  • Status: offline
Re: 2015/02/27 09:08:25 (permalink)☄ Helpfulby simonboyle 2015/02/27 10:06:32
0
Ksparx
Okay, so any dose can cause cancer. But the rats and mice was given GW for 2 years straight?



Cancer wont develop overnight.  Even if they were given GW for 2 years straight, it doesn't mean that the length caused it. It might have started developing after 2 weeks. Who knows. These sarms are developed  for long term use that's why rats were given GW  for 2 years. I would not want to find out myself to be honest.  Company drops the project Just like that is red flag to me , but everybody is different.
#18
simonboyle
Pro-Member
  • Total Posts : 8783
  • Reward points: 4136
  • Joined: 2013/03/07 20:08:19
  • Status: offline
Re: 2015/02/27 10:08:17 (permalink)
0
^this. As I've said before, if big pharma think it is too risky, it is!
 
Also, we take AAS at 10 times the recommended dose, and many other things. Can take vit c at 10x the dose daily, not going to get cancer.
#19
Ksparx
New Member
  • Total Posts : 24
  • Reward points: 2480
  • Joined: 2012/01/02 13:44:51
  • Status: offline
Re: 2015/03/07 21:14:44 (permalink)
0
Don't want to stir up anything, but just saw that platinum nutraceuticals now also have GW-501516. Don't understand how they can put that **** on the marked if it's a ticking cancer bomb.
#20
Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Jump to:
©2018 All content is copyright of MuscleTalk.co.uk and its use elsewhere is prohibited.
(posting guidelines | privacy | advertise | earnings disclaimer | contact us | supported by)
© 2018 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.5