MuscleTalk Logo
Testosterone Replacement TherapyBanner

Would You Believe It.

New Member
  • Total Posts : 13
  • Reward points: 3605
  • Joined: 2005/01/28 16:58:19
  • Status: offline
2005/07/28 15:06:46 (permalink)

Would You Believe It.

After many years of training with medium volume sets i decided to give HIT a go. The priciples have been a real eye opener for me and i have had some good results.

I never thought this type of training would work , but i have been pleasently suprised.

What are the biggest misconceptions in training that you have found / discovered that has made a big difference to your training / results ?

This is not a debate on HIT, but just a means of understanding what has worked for us that is different to what the mags preach, sterotypicall training methods etc.


2 Replies Related Threads

    • Total Posts : 51156
    • Reward points: 15450
    • Joined: 2000/11/10 18:09:18
    • Location: Northants, UK
    • Status: offline
    RE: Would You Believe It. 2005/08/05 15:20:51 (permalink)
    interesting topic - I hope others will join in..........
    Olympian Member
    • Total Posts : 797
    • Reward points: 2486
    • Joined: 2005/03/23 18:21:04
    • Status: offline
    RE: Would You Believe It. 2005/08/05 15:44:28 (permalink)
    for me i find that i grow ( strength / size ) really well on a five day a week program.
    the difference... low volume. ie 7 sets for chest, 5 for bis, 9 for back etc.
    real short workouts.
    i prefer a periodised system.
    ill use the same weight for a few months (when ive reached a weight that im happy with ) . working to different rep schemes, 4-6, 6-8, 8-10, 10-12, 12-15(for legs,traps n 4 arms). sometimes to failure, sometimes not!!
    oh and i primarily use machines. hammer strength machines though.
    Jump to:
    ©2019 All content is copyright of and its use elsewhere is prohibited.
    (posting guidelines | privacy | advertise | earnings disclaimer | contact us | supported by)
    © 2019 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.5